Now is a great time to stock up on sauvignon blanc.
They're almost giving it away in some of the supermarkets.
There are two interconnected reasons for this - apart from
the buying power and routine discounting of the food barons:
first, the 2009 vintage is fast coming onto the market which,
second, means that any leftover stocks of 2008 will soon be
surplus to requirements.
But you all thought wine got better with age (and therefore
more valuable)? Yes, well, that depends on the kind of wine
you are talking about.
Many oak-aged red wines are built to last.
Your pinot noirs and cabernets and syrahs and bordeaux-style
reds.
Good chardonnays will often develop complexity and depth as
they lie a few years in the bottle; well-made riesling,
likewise, can acquire wonderful smooth limey/peachiness and a
fullness of flavour only hinted at a few years earlier.
But some wines are made to drink young and, with the
exception of a few notable labels, one or two of which I've
alluded to in the past, sauvignon blanc is among them.
And as I said, just now wine-makers and retailers are keen to
make a splash with their new arrivals, and those that still
have stock from past years will be falling over themselves to
get rid of it.
This includes some of the most respected labels.
So at the moment, for the savvy-lover, and I count myself
among them, it's Christmas out there.
The only problem is - which to choose.
Well, again, this doesn't have to be rocket science.
Sauvignon blanc is grown in regions apart from Marlborough,
but in my view, if it's not from Marlborough then it falls
more into the curiosity camp than the sure thing.
Most self-respecting labels have come round to this and even
Central Otago sauvignons will generally be made with grapes
sourced from somewhere in the vicinity of Blenheim.
So nine times out of 10 I'd go for the trademark regional
wine that put the New Zealand industry on the map.
And mostly I'd go for the newer model: the perfect vin de
table - economical, comparatively light (in both alcohol,
tannins and other complex flavour components), fruity but not
sweet, refreshing, undemanding.
It could be the viniferous equivalent of the airport novel,
though it would be a mistake to equate their simplicity for a
lack of breeding or class.
A bit like judging a book by its cover, actually.
The point is that the young, vital, zingy sauvignon blanc is
now recognised as a classical, and classy wine.
And, provided the fruit is half-way reasonable to begin with
and the winemaker is competent, it's not a complicated wine
to make.
So, again, you don't have to aim for the top to get some top
wines - it's the most "democratic", and least temperamental
of all our grape varieties
The other day I picked up the just-released bog-standard
Marlborough Montana Sauvignon Blanc 2009 for about $11.
At that price I should have bought a case - or two.
Very pleasant, easy-drinking wine, with the familiar grassy,
gooseberry-ish characteristics.
Likewise the entry-level Saint Clair Marlborough Sauvignon
Blanc 2009.
If the most basic of their range is this good, then watch out
for their "better" ones.
The Recommended Retail Price on this one is closer to $20, as
is the Sacred Hill 2009 Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc, another
excellent example of the genre.
But shop around.
Get out there and look around for those specials - Dashwood,
Allan Scott, Hunters, Stoneleigh, Villa Maria, Drylands,
Astrolabe, Selaks, Vidal, Shingle Peak.
You can't go too far wrong.
And don't turn your nose up at the 2008s either.
Some of these are currently on the shelves at under $10 - and
that is a serious bargain.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.