Community pharmacists and general practitioners are being
encouraged to take part in a pilot programme designed to find
out more about medication errors and how to prevent them.
The Medication Error Reporting and Prevention pilot is funded
by the Ministry of Health and is being run by the national
pharmacovigilance centre at the University of Otago.
During the pilot, which will end in May, about 40 pharmacists
and a similar number of GPs will anonymously use a secure
web-based reporting system to report medication errors and
near misses.
One of the investigators, centre director Dr Michael Tatley,
emphasised the purpose of the pilot was not to apportion
blame over any of these events, but to establish what
happened and see what could be learned from that.
Those participating would be asked for details about what
happened, what led to it, how the situation was handled, how
the error might be prevented and what actions might have been
taken to prevent future errors.
The programme was not designed to intervene in an event.
By the time a wrong dose, wrong drug or other matter was
reported, the actual event would have been dealt with and
that needed to happen as part of pharmacists' and GPs' "own
local protocols", he said.
Information identifying patients or the health professionals
participating would not be submitted.
Medications covered under the pilot included prescription,
pharmacy-only medicines, those bought over the counter,
vaccines, complementary and herbal medicines. Blood products
would not be included.
Internationally, medicine errors had been identified as the
leading cause of harm to hospital patients and there had been
increasing attention to programmes to report and prevent
errors in that setting. However, less was known about the
situation in the community and how big the problem was, Dr
Tatley said.
There was some information from organisations such as ACC and
the National Poisons Centre through patient safety incident
reporting systems. During the pilot, anonymised information
from them would also be collated.
Co-investigator Dr Desiree Kunac carried out a review of 1412
spontaneous reports made to the Centre for Adverse Reactions
Monitoring during 2007, which showed about 4% of events
reported that year could have been prevented.
About two-thirds of these were associated with some degree of
patient harm and included such errors as incorrect dose, drug
interactions and lack of necessary clinical monitoring.
About 80% of the 61 errors identified were deemed to have
originated in the community setting.
In the long term, the hope was that the system being tested
in the pilot would be used to establish a national database
of medication errors originating in the community. Such a
system could then be used to help develop any needed
preventive measures.
Dr Tatley said the investigators did not want to burden busy
health professionals and it was hoped the reports would take
between five and 10 minutes to complete.
He was hopeful there would be enough events recorded before
the pilot's end to provide "meaningful results". These would
demonstrate how useful the system was and how well it worked.
He was pleased to note general practitioners and pharmacists
were already showing interest in taking part in the pilot.
- elspeth.mclean@odt.co.nz
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.