Vice-chancellor among highest paid

Harlene Hayne.
Harlene Hayne.
New University of Otago vice-chancellor Prof Harlene Hayne has joined an exclusive group of New Zealand's highest paid public service chief executives.

Prof Hayne is expected to receive a remuneration package of up to $500,000, after stepping into her new role on August 15.

The State Services Commission annual report detailing the remuneration of New Zealand's public service and state sector chief executives shows former Otago vice-chancellor Prof Sir David Skegg received a total remuneration of between $540,000 and $549,999 for the year to June, which ranked him ninth on the New Zealand list.

After the report was released, the university declined to release details of Prof Haynes' remuneration package.

But after a request under the Official Information Act, the university supplied a projected total of between $490,000 and $500,000.

Remuneration levels for tertiary education chief executives are set by the respective university and polytechnic councils, with the State Services commissioner making the final decisions.

Otago Polytechnic chief executive Phil Ker's remuneration band is between $290,000 and $299,999, down from his 2009-10 figure of $330,000 to $339,999.

Otago Polytechnic council chairwoman Kathy Grant told the Otago Daily Times in September, the reported drop in Mr Ker's remuneration had not been made by council members.

A change in dates for the reporting period meant some performance bonuses had fallen outside the yearly payment consideration, which appeared to be how the discrepancy between the two years had come about.

The council had "no issue" with his performance and there had been no cause to review his remuneration, she said.

Aoraki Polytechnic chief executive Kay Nelson's remuneration band of $210,000 to $219,999 for the period is up about $20,000 from the previous year.

University of Auckland vice-chancellor Prof Stuart McCutcheon is the highest paid tertiary figure in New Zealand, earning between $640,00 and $649,000 in the 12 months to June.

He is New Zealand's third-highest paid public service chief executive.

The vice-chancellors of Massey University, Victoria University of Wellington and the University of Canterbury all have remuneration of more than $500,000.

The revised projected figure of up to $500,000 for the new Otago vice-chancellor would have been ranked about 16th on the list, about $10,000 to $20,000 less than the head of the Department of the Prime Minister.

 

 

Well deserved

Well said Missy. Those people deserve thier salaries - they keep the economy going. What is $500,000? Go to USA - $100 million is a problem

We've got a prime minister who earns $500,000 a year and gives most away. Can you see this anywhere else in the world? Don't think so.[Abridged]

Actually, someone has tested it

Actually, someone has tested the theory that wages could be set without regard to market forces, and that childcare workers should be paid the same or similar to doctors and University vice-chancellors.

East Germany, up until 1989. Great system. People loved it. They needed razor wire and machine guns to stop people moving there. 

 

Salaries

Hype-O, I think the salaries of the CEO's of Telecom, Fonterra, Vodafone, etc are the tipping point, not the salary of the university VC. Note that the position has actually had a reduction and Auckland's VC is paid $140,000 per year more for doing the same job. VC's typically are not paid multi-million dollar bonuses for doing their job, unlike the CEO of Qantas who despite overseeing a poor showing by the company, received a $2.2 million dollar back-hander. There has been a legacy of overpaid employees around, including massively overpaid rugby players! In that context, Professor Hayne should be paid twice as much.

HIghest paid vice-chancellor

I've nothing against Prof Haynes.  What I have seen of her work has filled me with admiration.  But that's not quite the point is it?  It's the contrast between another record-breaking high salary at the same time as the Occupy movement throughout the world as well as a cow-bell's ring from the ODT is protesting about the shocking gap between rich and poor, between grunts and grandees.

What is the negotiation process that takes place resulting in salaries like that of a vice-chancellor, or the sickening example of Qantas CEO Alan Joyce http://www.odt.co.nz/opinion/opinion/184806/increasing-inclination-question-system ?  Do able people refuse to work for less?  Will only monkeys work for less?  Has anyone tested this hypothesis and its corrollary, that people on very low wages are monkeys but are perfectly suited to  jobs such as the care of children and sick and elderly people?

Which leads to another question: what kind of people deserve to be the responsibility monkeys?  The trouble with asking money and fairness questions is that so many factors are interlinked, and yet in these columns one writer after another demands short answers to "What do the Occupy people want, why can't they say what it's about?"

So while I do not begrudge Pro Haynes a good salary for a responsible position I wish I could see the University as a whole take on board the research that shows societies with flatter rich-poor structure are happier, more productive, more stable, then develop policy to work towards that end in the small sector of the planet that they control.  It has to start somewhere.

Obscene

Like many I suppose, I have walked passed our 'tent city mob' in the Octagon and wondered whether their actions are truly altruistic or just the actions of a bunch of attention-grabbing loafers.

Then I read articles like this one and wonder what sort of society have we created where the differential between those who 'have' and those who do not, can be so wide.

Is it greed? I don't know but whatever it is, it's not right.