Hundreds sign petition opposing liquor ban

University of Otago students (from right) Anh Hoang and Kimberley Houliston sign a petition calling for an alternative to the extension of the liquor ban in central Dunedin. Photo by Craig Baxter.
University of Otago students (from right) Anh Hoang and Kimberley Houliston sign a petition calling for an alternative to the extension of the liquor ban in central Dunedin. Photo by Craig Baxter.
Hundreds of University of Otago students are signing a petition calling for an alternative to the proposed extension of the central city liquor ban in Dunedin.

In the first two hours of holding the petition yesterday, the Otago University Students' Association (OUSA) had gathered more than 600 signatures.

Students could add their names to the petition at an OUSA marquee set up within the tent city on the museum lawn. The tents and marquees will remain on the lawn throughout the week of Orientation.

OUSA president Logan Edgar said the association had developed ideas for an alternative to the liquor ban extension.

A bottle or glass ban could possibly be imposed in North Dunedin, which would allow some alcohol to be consumed without leading to litter and safety problems.

Other ideas included more consultation expressly with students, and greater student education on alcohol.

Ideally, public debate on the issue would lead to a compromise of sorts, Mr Edgar said.

"You want to be able to sit with your girlfriend in a park and have a bottle of wine, or have a barbecue and some beers."

The Dunedin City Council's planning and environment committee considered a report this month from liquor licensing and projects officer Kevin Mechen to extend the central city liquor ban to permanently include the North Dunedin student area.

The committee voted to begin public consultation on the proposal and also consideredreviewing the present liquor restrictions in the central city to add a requirement for police to warn people in the first instance, unless it was impractical to do so.

In his report, Mr Mechen said Dunedin only extended its 24-hour, seven-day central city liquor restriction into North Dunedin for events that were likely to "lead to excessive alcohol consumption and subsequent street disorder".

The report recommends the proposed extension go to the public for submissions from February 25 to March 23 and that a hearing of the submissions should follow.

The issue of extending the liquor ban has been regularly raised since 2004, and multiple requests to extend the ban to cover North Dunedin have been formally put to the council since 2006.

 

Liquor ban

So it appears that all it takes to get people to rise up and rally against perceived social injustice is to look at imposing a liquor ban in public areas of North Dunedin. It surely makes for a sad society if all people have to live their life by is to be able to drink alcohol wherever it seems to suit them; especially without having to face the consequences of their individual actions for doing so.

It's also a sad indictment that the students association president keeps bandying about the education aspect when there is lots of educational information on the 'pros and cons' of alcohol, of which the overwhelming majority is in the negative. That said, I keep hearing how 'hard up' and 'poor' many students are, yet I see massive amounts of empty alcohol bottles, along with expensive fast food containers around this stated area.

I haven't seen anything that is stopping a person drinking within their own residence, so why are these people so overwhelmed and concerned?  As for my own view, I much prefer to be able to go for a run, bike ride, or walk without having to dodge what these same alcohol induced people choose to leave behind.

Would the DCC listen?

Would the DCC ever listen to its constituents that drive the local economy, or will they just impose draconian nanny state knows better laws over the top of them like they did with the parking and inner city business?