Council objects to logos on student flat

The Dunedin City Council has sent a letter to the owner of this Castle St flat asking them to either remove these  logos or apply for retrospective resource consent. Photo by Peter McIntosh.
The Dunedin City Council has sent a letter to the owner of this Castle St flat asking them to either remove these logos or apply for retrospective resource consent. Photo by Peter McIntosh.

A radio station and Dunedin property owner are in hot water over the sponsorship of a student flat.

The Castle St flat is sponsored by a radio station owned by the Radio Network, and earlier this year a large logo was painted on the side wall and a smaller one on the front. The council this week wrote asking the owner to either apply for resource consent for branding or remove it, an action one of the tenants called ''pathetic''.

The council's action comes amid a growing trend of sponsored student flats. Council resource consent manager Alan Worthington said the branding was within the council's definition of signage - meaning the owner should have applied for resource consent. It was unlikely consent would be given if the owner did apply, he said.

''I probably wouldn't encourage them to apply. The most expedient route would be to remove it, I would think.''

The brand logos were different from signs on other flats, which had been named by tenants.

''Obviously, there is a whole swag of those, which is part of the character of that environment.''

Radio Network promotions co-ordinator Laura Campbell said it arranged with the property owner for the sign to be put up and was not aware a resource consent was needed''Basically, the owner of the flat gave us consent; that's why we pushed forward,'' she said.

Flat tenant Abby Van de Vlierd (20) said the sign was ''harmless'' and the council asking for it to be removed was ''pathetic''.

The tenants had been given movie tickets and pizza vouchers as part of the sponsorship arrangement and Ms Van de Vlierd was disappointed the flow of free products could stop.

Otago Real Estate, listed as the contact address for the owner, did not return calls yesterday.

Former Otago student and member of staff Sarah Gallagher, who is writing a book on the history on named student flats in Dunedin, said sponsored student flats were a relatively new phenomenon.

However, the first named flat she was aware of - a flat in Leith St called ''The Bach'' - dated back to the 1930s and the practice became relatively common by the 1960s, she said.

Otago Business School senior marketing lecturer Dr John Guthrie said sponsoring a student flat was a ''mildly risky strategy'' - especially if the misbehaviour seen in the early 2000s returned.

''If it was in the wrong flat and the wrong place and the wrong students in it, that could backfire quite badly,'' he said.

Why is this an issue?

This is a stupid article. Why is it an issue to have something painted on the wall of a privately owned building? Whether it is a mural or logo? There are other flats in the exact same position...

Get them off

I agree that company logos are advertising and putting up large visible advertisments is an activity that should be controlled by the City Council.

Taken to the extreme, we don't want the city covered in signage.

Having siad that, I do know what it's like to be a student and I would have taken the free stuff from the sponsor gladly.