Elle evidence needed in hacking case

Lawyers will seek "prime and crucial" evidence from Elle Macpherson in a litigation brought by the supermodel's former Australian adviser, who claims to be a third-party victim of Britain's phone hacking scandal.

Mary-Ellen Field has been granted an adjournment in the UK High Court, enabling lawyers to apply for a deposition from Macpherson about her 2005 dismissal of the business adviser.

Ms Field lodged a claim against News Group Newspapers (NGN) in March last year alleging she was dumped by the famous fashionista after British tabloids printed information they had intercepted from Macpherson's voicemail.

Macpherson had blamed Field for leaking details to the press, the court was told.

Augustus Ullstein QC for Ms Field said attempts to secure information from Macpherson had to date been unsuccessful, and a copy of the model's police statement in the phone hacking matter had not been made available.

He said it was important to "have Ms Macpherson examined because some of the most vital evidence - so far as the claimant is concerned - is what the basis was for her dismissal by Ms Macpherson.

"There is ample evidence that that was the reason for her dismissal, the allegation that she was leaking information to the press, and the person who made that allegation has not yet given evidence.

"There is a prime and crucial source of further evidence and one of the difficulties (in securing the information) is that Ms Macpherson shuttles between here and Australia."

NGN has sought the matter struck out, citing a lack of evidence.

"This claim is not fanciful; it is fantasy," Michael Silverleaf QC for NGN told the court on Monday.

"One is very sorry for the hurt Ms Field has suffered but the problem is she suffered it at the hands of other people."

Justice Vos said there was no substantive material supporting Ms Field's claim that private voicemail messages she left Macpherson were intercepted, leading to the publication of articles about the model in The Sun and News of the World newspapers.

"It seems to me that on the current pleading ... there are some fairly persuasive grounds on which the matter should be (dismissed)," Justice Vos said.

"(However) I'm left today harbouring a doubt that the claim, in some circumstances which are not yet available to the court, could be supported."

Justice Vos said Macpherson had indicated previously through lawyers that she is prepared to offer her full co-operation to the court and granted the adjournment for a date to be fixed.

He added that Macpherson is not due back in the UK until January next year.

Mr Silverleaf remained resolute that the matter should be struck out.

"It is bound to fail," he told the court of Ms Field's claim.

"There is no material at present and there is nothing from which the court could reasonably conclude that there would be supporting evidence in the future."

Ms Field was the only Australian and one of more than 330 witnesses to give oral evidence at a major inquiry into the ethics and culture of the British press, chaired by Lord Justice Brian Leveson.

The probe was launched following reports of widespread phone hacking.