Fred Daniels: "We have the responsibility of determining
the [country's] burden of care for those veterans". Photos
by Linda Robertson.
Does New Zealand adequately look after its living roll
of honour - the estimated 50,000 war veterans who have served
their country in conflicts from WW2 to Iraq? The Law Commission
says not, labelling our eligibility and war pension payment
systems "very outdated" and "completely inadequate".
But all that is about to change.
Reporter Allison Rudd examines two processes happening in
tandem - the establishment of the first expert panel on
veterans' health, and the review of the 55-year-old War
Pensions Act.
For a country with a proud history of military involvement
over 150 years, we do not know much about our veterans.
We do not know exactly how many there are - we stopped asking
that after the 1971 census.
We give them war pensions and allowances based on a system
which has remained largely unchanged since 1954.
Until now, we have not had a panel to specifically examine
the impact of military service on veterans' health.
The system for measuring veterans' impairment is complicated
and clumsy, and, some veterans say, applied inconsistently.
Service people - almost exclusively men - injured before the
introduction of ACC in 1974 are financially disadvantaged.
A pre-1974 veteran on a 100% disablement pension receives
$182.02 a week, while post-1974 veterans are paid 80% of
their wages at the time they were injured.
More than 205,000 people served in World War 2, of whom
135,000 were posted overseas.
Of the estimated 35,000-40,000 who are still alive, only 9350
are receiving a war pension.
The 1954 War Pensions Act does not deal well with the types
of injuries or disease post-WW2 veterans are likely to
suffer.
It is no wonder it is time for an overhaul.
Former national RSA president John Campbell, of Dunedin, has
worked tirelessly over the past eight years to persuade
governments to take the nation's responsibilities to veterans
more seriously.
The past five years have seen rapid advances, starting with a
parliamentary health select committee investigation into
health issues suffered by Vietnam veterans.
That resulted in a 2006 memorandum of understanding between
the RSA and the Government on agreed health conditions and
pension payments to those veterans.
The RSA has also intensified a campaign to encourage
veterans, particularly WW2 veterans now in their mid-80s and
older, to apply for war pensions and to help them with the
form-filling and report-gathering that process requires.
The campaign is working.
Mr Campbell said while the number of WW2 veterans was
steadily declining and was expected to drop by as many as
20,000 in the next decade, the number of applications for war
pensions was increasing.
In 2007, it was announced the Law Commission would completely
rewrite the War Pensions Act to make it simpler, more
relevant and more streamlined.
The Law Commission said the rewrite should clarify exactly
what health conditions were attributable to war service, thus
reducing "unacceptable delays" in processing veterans'
pension claims.
The most recent advance was the naming this month of the new
expert panel on health.
The advances are supported by Dunedin RSA identity Fred
Daniel.
A Vietnam veteran whose army career spanned 32 years, Mr
Daniel is chief executive of the Montecillo War Veterans'
Home and also one of a number of panellists around the
country who make the initial assessments about the
eligibility of veterans for disability pensions.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.