Bill English
Speculation is rife that the $700 million of "bad bank"
loans of failed South Canterbury Finance - now owned by the
Government - may climb higher, adding to projected taxpayer
losses.
After South Canterbury was placed in receivership, the
Government moved quickly to assure investors it would pay out
$1.6 billion, under its retail deposit guarantee scheme,
taking ownership of about $1 billion of secure "good bank"
loans and $700 million in higher-risk bad bank loans, which
include many loan defaulters.
The Government has estimated that after the sale of the
assets of the good and bad bank loans during the next three
to four years, taxpayers would be out of pocket by about $600
million, of which the bad loans are at present expected to
account for about $400 million.
However, Craigs Investment Partners broker Peter McIntyre
believed there could be more debt in the bad loans to be
accounted for, noting it had already grown over several
months from $500 million to the $700 million, at receivership
date on Tuesday.
Of that $700 million, he estimated $350 million-$400 million
was in rural property loans, being "impaired or struggling"
to make repayments.
"There is likely to be further deterioration on the property
book, mainly for the lending in the rural sector... Given 60%
of loans are in the South Island, a high proportion of that
will be rural," he said.
A spokesman for Finance Minister Bill English said receivers
McGrathNicol were working on such day-to-day matters, while
the receivers had no comment on the speculation over the bad
loans.
Farming leaders are already airing concerns that a rash of
forced South Canterbury farm sales would further depress
prices, and are calling on receivers to take a measured
approach.
The statutory management of two of the companies and seven
trusts associated with South Canterbury Finance's driving
force Allan Hubbard (82), is entirely separate from and
unconnected to South Canterbury's receivership.
However, the managers have disclosed in their latest report
that of $83 million invested in farming-related loans, $59
million is in Hubbard-related farm businesses.
Managers GrantThornton have said of loans to 25 dairy farms,
it was expected just 17 of 51 loans would have their
September interest payments met; leaving a shortfall of 50%,
or more than $1 million.
When announcing the receivership, South Canterbury chief
executive Sandy Maier said its financial reports to June,
which were also due for release on the recapitalisation
deadline of August 31, were likely to reveal that "there will
be more debts than assets".
When contacted yesterday, he said the bad bank loans carried
about $700 million of soured loans, but he expected the
receivers would realise "more than $300 million in cash" from
bad loan sales.
He would not categorically rule out the possibility of there
being more bad bank loans, saying only that in recent months
these had not been updated often and he understood "that not
much had changed on the [bad] loans book".
He was unsure if the accounts to June would be published at
all, saying that was now a decision for the receivers.
National Bank chief economist, Cameron Bagrie, said the four
major banks were ready to buy and take over some South
Canterbury loans, which would result in a higher premium for
some borrowers.
"There is a big portion of South Canterbury loans which are
not good. [Our] savers expect their money to be lent out
responsibly," he said.
There would be instances where rural borrowers, whose initial
South Canterbury funding was for "rural loans which were
speculative and carrying a high degree of risk," might find
interest rates too high and could default.
Given the Government had signalled a $600 million loss to
taxpayers, it would be selling South Canterbury loans or
assets for possibly 65c in the dollar, he said.
"[However] in some form there may be sales of zero cents in
the dollar. There are bad bank loans which will have to be
exited."
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.