Tinkering with parts of the Employment Contracts Act
involving "vulnerable workers" would result in years of
litigation and Employment Court disputes, Crest Commercial
Cleaning managing director Grant McLauchlan warned yesterday.
Crest Commercial Cleaning managing director Grant
McLauchlan. Photo by Gregor Richardson.
Mr McLauchlan, of Dunedin, and Crest have been running a
website called "Vulnerable Minister" which is critical of
Labour Minister Kate Wilkinson, particularly on Part 6A of the
Part 6A requires employers in the cleaning, catering, orderly
and laundry industries to take on the staff of a competitor
if they win a contract in any of those particular industries.
Mr McLauchlan was in Singapore when he received news of the
changes announced on Tuesday by Ms Wilkinson that included
exempting employers with fewer than 20 employees from having
to take on staff doing the work under the previous contract
"Well we, and I believe a majority of the industries affected
by Part 6A, are gobsmacked by this announcement that clearly
reflects the lack of greater industry consultation and
engagement through this statutory review," he told the
Otago Daily Times.
Crest had previously warned that any untested "soft"
amendments would have significant effects for contractors.
"For example, who is going to tally an incoming contractor's
employees to see if the amended Part 6A legislation applies?"
Ms Wilkinson used an example of a husband and wife cleaning
team who won a small contract being currently required to
take on any staff doing the work under the previous contract
owner. Her proposed amendments would remove that requirement.
However, Mr McLauchlan said that husband and wife team were
not covered or protected by Part 6A if they lost a contract,
because they were self-employed.
"The minister is naive to the real issues."
But the greatest issue with Part 6A was that since its
enactment in 2006, it had contributed 100% to the collapse of
the Building Services Contractors Industry Training
Organisation, he said.
None of the large cleaning companies were conducting any
industry training through the ITO for their staff because of
the likelihood they would work for the opposition in the
"This makes the very people it's designed to protect even
more vulnerable," Mr McLauchlan said.
Service and Food Workers Union national secretary John Ryall
levelled his criticism at Mr McLauchlan, when commenting on
the changes to the so-called vulnerable workers clause.
"This is not a change that has been sought by the legitimate,
large employers in the sector who value a stable workforce
and understand the need for protections when contracts change
"It is the result of a one-man band campaign from Crest Clean
- a company which has fought hard to resist complying with
law that was put in place to prevent workers in cut-throat
industries being used as pawns to drive down costs."
Part 6A was not about preserving high wages. It was about
maintaining a stable workforce in the industry and good
employers understood it was good for business, Mr Ryall said.