The New Zealand Historic Places
Trust has rejected criticism it is holding up work on a
planned Mediterranean garden in Dunedin, and says it has not
seen a report on the site, nor has it made a recommendation.
Dunedin City Council sources, and those involved in the
garden, last week criticised an archaeological report
prepared by Southern Pacific Archaeology Research, and the
direction of the trust.
The report suggested the garden, to be built within the
Dunedin Botanic Garden, be built elsewhere, because there may
have been a building there in the past.
Much of the funding for the project had come from a bequest
from Nancye Sime, a noted chrysanthemum and rose judge who
died in 2004, aged 87.
Trust Otago-Southland area manager, Owen Graham, said it had
been unjustly criticised.
He said the report was commissioned by the council and had
not been sighted by the trust.
"Consequently, we are not in a position to recommend any
actions or make any demands on the council at this time."
The trust had advised a council-convened working party in
2000 there was a possibility work at the garden would uncover
archaeological material from pre-European and early European
activities.
This year, it had provided advice to council staff on
procedures for the development, including seeking an
independent archaeological assessment for the site.
Mr Graham said the trust had a responsibility to promote the
identification, protection, preservation and conservation of
the historical and cultural heritage of New Zealand, and a
statutory responsibility to administer the archaeological
authority process.
"The discovery of the very important wooden causeway at the
council's Wall Street development site last week is an
extremely good example of the reasons why the trust's
archaeological authority process is in place."
He said the trust had not been responsible for any delays.
Criticism of it fulfilling its statutory obligations were
unjust and comments its activities "bordered on frivolous"
were wrong.
The trust would quickly review the assessment once it was
provided, and advise whether an archaeological authority was
needed.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.