A Dunedin man, one of hundreds sent to New Zealand from the
United Kingdom under a notorious child migrant scheme, said
he would "definitely" consider using a new fund designed to
help reunite migrants with their families.
The funding covered the practical costs of travel, and was
available to any child migrant sent under school-leaving age
from Great Britain and Northern Ireland to countries
including Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Zimbabwe, The
Sydney Morning Herald reported.
The scheme operated from the late 1800s through to 1970, with
some 130,000 mostly poor or orphaned children aged between 7
and 14 sent to British Commonwealth countries.
It is thought between 7000 and 10,000 children were sent to
Australia over 20 years from 1947, and many were brought up
in institutions, by farmers or treated as child slaves.
Some children were taken from poor families and told they
were orphans, while their parents believed that they were
headed to a better life.
John McGrory, of Green Island, was one of 549 children sent
to New Zealand following World War 2.
In February, then UK prime minister Gordon Brown issued an
official apology for the child resettlement programme, and
foreshadowed the 6 million ($NZ12.6 million) Family
Restoration Fund which had been announced this week.
Mr McGrory was one of three New Zealanders selected to fly to
London as guests of the British Government to hear the
apology.
He said last night he had kept in touch with his parents, who
separated when he was a baby.
But he was keen to get in touch with his father's sister's
family, although he did not know where they were, and his
stepsister.
"Oh yes," he said last night of using the fund, "I would love
to."
Mr McGrory said Mr Brown had mentioned the scheme when he had
travelled to the United Kingdom, so he was aware it was
coming.
He was 13 when he was sent to Dunedin, and had a happy life
with his foster parents, unlike many others who faced abuse.
david.loughrey@odt.co.nz
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.