Strict rules govern CCTV camera use

Dunedin CCTV. ODT graphic.
Dunedin CCTV. ODT graphic.
Big Brother's watchful eye could turn on the volunteers monitoring 14 new CCTV cameras in Dunedin's Octagon if they abuse guidelines governing the cameras' use.

The warning comes with a list of six broad principles to be considered on Monday by councillors at the Dunedin City Council finance and strategy committee meeting on governing the use of the $205,000 camera system.

The 14 cameras - a joint safety project involving the council, Dunedin police and Ministry of Justice - are being installed in the Octagon this week, and are expected go live from November 4.

However, among the rules governing their use is one warning volunteers monitoring the images that they will have to explain themselves if an audit detects they singled out an individual member of the public for unwarranted scrutiny.

Dunedin-Clutha area commander Inspector Dave Campbell told the Otago Daily Times the rule aimed to prevent volunteers from spying on a neighbour or following the movements of an attractive person.

Volunteers monitoring the images would not be able to remotely zoom or tilt the cameras, but would be able to enlarge small sections of what appeared on their screens, he said.

"Obviously we don't want people to monitor members of the public because they might know the person, or they might be a neighbour, or whatever.

"Monitors have to have a good reason if they want to track the movements of a particular person," he said.

A report to Monday's meeting, by council customer advocate Adrian Blair, outlined the principles.

They included the fair use of the cameras, which would be used only within relevant laws, for the purposes the system was established, and with "due regard" for privacy and civil liberties.

Police and the council would be jointly responsible for the cameras' proper operation, and information clearly provided about the cameras.

Volunteers would also be vetted and trained by police, and images stored securely and deleted after a specified time unless required for evidence.

Civil liberties

If these cameras help to apprehend those whose bashings and other misbehaviour has given our Central City a bad name, especially in the hours of darkness, then I am all for their widespread use. If, on the other hand, like 'Leon', you would rather argue vague privacy issues and semantics while the assaults continue unchecked, then it's a case, I guess, of 'whatever lights your candle'. I know which viewpoint, I support.

Civil liberty?

I don't think anyone knows what civil liberty means anymore. Cameras tracking movements of people in public violates the very essence of civil liberty and privacy. What a perversion of our law system.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Camerons OamaruOamaruClothing
Scott ContractingRanfurlyAgriculture
A Motor Company LtdDunedinCar Sales
Insitu ArchitectureQueenstownArchitects & Architectural Designers