Council identifies new cuts

A Dunedin City Council facing unpopular rates rises, and fresh from election promises of financial prudence, will tomorrow start discussing a staff report that has identified $794,300 of cuts for the next financial year.

The proposals follow resolutions from the council calling for more savings than the $4 million slashed from the budget at the end of last year.

So far, at least, they have been delivered without too much pain for staff, council projects, or service levels, but Mayor Dave Cull was adamant last night more cuts would come.

The report, from council financial planner Carolyn Howard, will go to the city's annual plan hearings deliberations, due to start tomorrow morning.

The council began considering the year's finances after a cost-cutting drive led by former chief executive Jim Harland late last year aimed at slashing $6 million from the council's spending.

The drive eventually trimmed $4 million, and the council now faces a 7.5% rates rise.

Mr Cull indicated he considered that too high, and a February 7 decision by the council set up departmental review groups to work with acting chief executive Athol Stephens to identify operational savings to reduce costs.

Before that, they were to work with Mr Stephens to find savings for this year's annual plan, with those savings to have a minimal impact on service levels.

Ms Howard's report said as many of the 41 reductions found were ongoing, $7.1 million would be saved over the next 10 years.

Mr Cull said he expected the report held the last of the savings for this year's plan. Further cuts from departmental reviews would have to wait until 2012.

While the results were "gratifying", more had to come, and that would take time.

The largest saving for the next year was $200,000 from water and waste services.

That included savings from using in-house provision of mechanical and electrical services, rationalising the way chemicals were bought, and from increased rental income.

Other savings in that department included $50,000 a year for reducing water pressure and $50,000 a year from longer "response times".

Asked about the apparent ease of finding the savings when the pre-Christmas cost-cutting drive had been so recently completed, water and waste services manager John Mackie yesterday said he had been calling for the changes for years.

To agree to the savings would require "spirit and fortitude", as there would be complaints.

Chemicals, worth about $1.5 million, had been bought by three separate council entities - water and waste, aquatic services and Delta Utility Services.

Water pressure in Dunedin was too high in some areas, and could be easily lowered, although some residents would complain, Mr Mackie said.

The savings would include less water and fewer chemicals being used, and fewer leaks and breaks in pipes.

Not filling a retiring building control officer's position was expected to save $74,000 and retaining the parking officer vacancy $30,000.

Customer services identified a $35,000 saving if the i-Site Visitor Centre was shifted to another Princes St address, as it had suggested, and marketing communications found $25,000 by deferring buying Christmas decorations.

Finance, strategy and development chairman Cr Syd Brown said a new chief executive, when appointed, would have a mandate from the council to make long-term changes, with support and co-operation from senior staff essential.

 

Council expenditure 'cuts'

These minimalist "cuts" demonstrate once again that accountants and many general managers lack the training and knowledge about how to reduce expenditure. This may sound strange but ask any accountant what training they have received in this area. Many managers know that accountants are adept at cutting funding by a percentage,i.e. the "shotgun" approach, but that is the easy way compared with microscopically reviewing every cost item and staff levels. Poor general management over several years has allowed DCC staff numbers to increase much faster then Dunedin's population. Why? What would happen if staff numbers were arbritrarily cut by say 50? It is very obvious that the existing general managers are ring-fencing their empires to fend off any staff cuts, and that the acting CEO will not apply pressure for such reductions.

underwhelmed

This could have been an April 1, ODT fun article - except it's May 10. This goes to show the council isn't really that serious about reducing debt and rates. There is no hiding the fact painful cuts will have to be made for which the stadium carries a great share in the problem. The council just can't bite the bullet.

This 'cut' will of course be eaten up by more calls for more stadium extras funding for which Mayor Cull and his council at large will have no problem in granting. Thanks for the courageous Christmas decoration cut. Let's not even bother putting them up- and save more money.  

'Three little words'

Three words sum up this exercise in cosmetic futility. 'Inadequate',' unconvincing' or 'pathetic' . Take your pick, or like me, take all three.

 

Fascinating DCC savings

Well blow me down, as they say. That is the first time I have ever seen an increase in rental income, or any other income, described as a 'saving'. Still, it all goes someway towards funding the unwanted stadium, although I have a feeling when operating income, less operating expenses are known they might just need to find a few more 'savings'.

And there was much rejoicing

Only seven hundred thousand dollars? This council’s most recent spend up on professional rugby gutted community funding and redevelopment ledgers of millions of dollars. Thereby likely affecting grassroots rugby.

And now they return up to seven hundred thousand dollars to another ledger? So far it is just an administrative review – mostly all talk and hidden costs. Stadium councillor Syd Brown must be quite proud of his actions.

And come on Otago Daily Times, you make this article sound like a winner for Mayor Dave Cull but know this amount of money is a mere pittance considering the spendthrift behaviour of the previous council and what looks to be continuing methodology with this one.

[Abridged]

Good and bad

It's a long way from the $20 million that the working party was supposed to come up with to offset the increased cost of the stadium.

But then again, they didn't replace a parking officer.  More cuts in this area please, that would be a vote-winner. 

Don't forget

Don't forget that our rates bills have two components - the costs (which are reduced by this change) and the rebate - income from the DCC corporation's dividends that are passed through to us to reduce our rates (the result of investments by our canny forefathers).

When the council talks about rates changes they seldom talk about changes that might reduce the rebate (and as a result increase our rates) - since the stadium and the companies that run it have been put into the same pot as the companies that make those dividends. Capital costs (ie building the stadium) and any losses (in running the stadium) will come out of the same pot and reduce the dividends and as a result our rates rebate - the real amount we pay in rates will go up by more than the amount the council usually talks about.

[Abridged]

 

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
St Mary's School - KaikoraiDunedinSchools
Kitchen ConnectionsDunedinSpecialist Trades
Williams Signs & Graphix LtdDunedinSigns & Signwriting
Wolfenden & RussellDunedinClothing