Studies of other animals' feeding behaviour may help
explain why humans are susceptible to obesity in the modern
environment, internationally recognised nutritional ecologist
Prof David Raubenheimer says.
In a lecture in Dunedin on Monday night Prof Raubenheimer,
originally from South Africa and now at Massey University,
said nutritional ecologists typically asked questions about
why animals chose foods, what they did if they could not get
the foods required and what the consequences of their choices
were.
An audience of about 200 people listen to nutritional
ecologist Prof David Raubenheimer outline some of his
research into nutrition at the David St lecture theatre in
a public lecture hosted by Genetics Otago, the National
Research Centre for Growth and Development and the Otago
Institute. Photo by Peter McIntosh.
Despite a vast amount of research into these questions,
they remained poorly answered for most animals.
The reason was nutrition was "deceptively complex".
To help address this he had been involved with the
development of nutritional geometry, which used mathematical
concepts to show how animals achieved the balance of
carbohydrates/fats to protein.
While research is ongoing, including that involving several
types of monkeys, chimpanzees, gorillas and humans, studies
so far have shown some differences.
A study of mountain gorillas in Uganda showed their behaviour
appeared to be different from humans and spider monkeys.
While humans who choose food rich in carbohydrate and fats
overeat those foods to get sufficient protein, the gorillas
appeared to do the opposite.
They prioritised non-protein energy and to do this, during
the eight months of the year when their diet was restricted
to protein-rich leaves, they ended up oversupplying
themselves with protein in order to get sufficient fats and
carbohydrates.
The amount of protein the gorillas were consuming in these
circumstances was similar to that recommended on the
high-protein human weight-loss Atkins diet.
During the other four months of the year, when they were
eating a fruit-dominated diet, the amount of protein the
gorillas took in was similar to that recommended for humans,
about 15% of total food intake, or about half the Atkins diet
level.
The research suggested an Atkins-type diet would "absolutely
not" work on gorillas.
However, a similar study of spider monkeys showed their
behaviour was similar to humans.
It was hoped the extensive study of other primates and more
human studies would provide a "better handle" on what was
driving the differences, he said.
There were a number of reasons the protein content of humans'
diet had become diluted with fats and carbohydrates in recent
years, including the relatively high price of protein.
Prof Raubenheimer has suggested craving for protein caused
people to overeat low-protein food.
elspeth.mclean@odt.co.nz
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.