Vehicles back on John Wilson Drive

Motorists will again be driving along John Wilson Ocean Dr next year, after emotional arguments and pleas to compromise at yesterday's Dunedin City Council meeting won the day - by just a single vote.

Councillors voted 8-7 to allow vehicle access between 11am and 2pm on weekdays, but to exclude traffic completely on weekends and public holidays.

The Ocean Drive will become a 30kmh maximum speed zone and will get $45,000 worth of traffic-calming measures, including speed humps, road markings and signs.

However, the resealed road will not be ready until after July 1 next year, once resurfacing previously scheduled for 2012-13 had been completed.

The decision came amid interjections from the public gallery and despite last-minute concerns from councillors worried the "compromise" would please nobody.

It came after Cr Bill Acklin, who led the charge for reinstating vehicle access, appeared braced for defeat, facing strong, vocal opposition from some other councillors.

He told the meeting he had asked every submitter to last year's public hearing on the future of the road whether they would be prepared to compromise. It appeared while most motorists had been willing to share, most other users had not, a position he called "selfish".

Cr Acklin appeared close to tears when the vote was eventually decided, with Crs John Bezett, Neil Collins, Paul Hudson, Andrew Noone, Richard Thomson, Lee Vandervis and Colin Weatherall joining him voting for vehicle access.

Votes against were cast by Mayor Dave Cull, deputy mayor Chris Staynes and Crs Syd Brown, Fliss Butcher, Jinty MacTavish, Teresa Stevenson and Kate Wilson.

The decision came two and a-half years after debate over the road's future erupted, after the council confirmed the road - closed in 2006 for construction of the Tahuna outfall pipe - was to remain closed indefinitely.

The sometimes-heated debate has divided councillors and the community in the years since, but councillors appeared no closer to resolution yesterday than they did at last month's community development committee.

The vote at last month's meeting on whether to reinstate vehicles had been locked 6-6, until Cr Acklin's casting vote came down in favour of motorists and sent the decision to yesterday's council meeting for final approval.

And yesterday's vote came despite Cr MacTavish urging councillors not to take a "rushed decision", given the costs and the changing use of the road she said was likely to continue.

Cr Wilson praised the "wonderful process" that had got councillors compromising, but said she would nevertheless vote against motor vehicle access because it would undermine the experience for walkers and cyclists.

Cr Butcher changed her position from last month, saying she would vote against the move because speed humps would ruin the experience for cyclists, walkers and motorists alike.

Cr Collins disagreed, saying the road had been "captured" by non-motorists after being shared for almost 50 years. He wanted vehicles reinstated for restricted hours seven days a week, but would accept the compromise.

So too would Cr Thomson, despite his personal preference for the road to remain vehicle-free, and Cr Bezett, who said he disliked the compromise but would vote for it despite wanting greater vehicle access.

Cr Stevenson argued the road should remain closed, with special permits for restricted vehicle access.

Cr Vandervis said failure to compromise would see the council "stuck with this embarrassing, unresolved issue forever".

Mr Cull said he had been "torn" but said it was "time to bite the bullet" and keep the road as a walkway.

Such was the disagreement, Mr Cull took the unusual step of moving straight to a vote by division, where councillors had to announce which way they were voting one after another.

That showed vehicle access had squeaked through, with the yes votes of Crs Hudson and Vandervis, who missed last month's meeting, being crucial.

Crs Collins and Butcher also changed their votes from last month - Cr Collins to yes, and Cr Butcher to no. The no vote of Mr Cull, who missed last month's meeting, was not enough to change the result.


Close-vote compromise

• Open to vehicles between 11am-2pm on weekdays.

• Closed to vehicles weekends and public holidays.

• $45,000 worth of speed humps, road markings and other traffic-calming measures.

• Work delayed until after previously planned $125,000 road resealing, scheduled for 2012-13.

• Restricted vehicle access starts some time after July 1 next year.


DCC listen with deaf ears

Councillors took an oath when entering office to 'put aside their personal views and consider each case on its merits'. I have talked to a number of the Councillors and have found that rather than listening to the community, many have voted their own on idelogical grounds.

They have stated their goal in the Long Term Plan and the Spatial Plan to engage and consult the community, but obviously not on anything they have a view on?

Also the presentation to the councillor by the working party reminded me once again of the TV Series 'Yes Prime Minister', give them two options one unpalatable and one that the council supports and ask the councillors to choose between the two. Speed bumps and traffic calming is the lastest impediment thrown in front of the Councillors. How many different reason have they found for trying to keep the road closed? One serious accident and a number of minor accident in recent times makes this a problem stretch of road. Like perhaps any other road of the city?

It is clear that shared access is part way towards a solution but without including weekends and public holidays, this will only become another failed attempt at compromise.

Great for the elderly and disabled folk

This is great news for those with mobility issues and the elderly,  but not so good for those of us who work fulltime during the week. For me, weekends are the only time I can show visiting friends around Dunedin, so that's one place we won't be driving to.

If the weather isn't great, as is often the case, they'll just have to miss out.  It does seem a shame for those tourists who are not in Dunedin between 11am and 2pm, Monday to Friday. 

Personally, I think the best solution would have been to open it during daylight hours, ie. have it closed off at night. But at least it's a start I guess. However, compared to the access we used to have, it certainly now seems to be an erosion of our freedom, and that is a tragedy.

 

 

 

Opening hours debate

Not long, DnMum. The debate about the hours for opening JWD has already started, as some of the posts here now testify.

JWD debate. Phase....? I've forgotten. 

Wow, what an honour

Thank you DCC councillors for allowing the general public the honour of allowing vehicle access on John Wilson Ocean Dr between 11am and 2pm on weekdays, but to exclude traffic completely on weekends and public holidays and to start some time as early as after July 1 next year. 

I feel so humbled by your most over generous decisions!

Thank you again DCC councillors your generosity is most overwhelming, most overwhelming indeed!

Just 3 hours

Just 3 hours in the middle of weekdays? Why bother?

Define 'rushed' please Jinty

You have to shake your head about Cr McTavish's concern the decision is a rushed one.  How many years does it take before a decision is not deemed to be rushed?

Lets hope this is the end of it all

Such a shame the vision free old boys of the DCC have done another big flop like a fish out of water. How long will it be until there's another debate about how many hours the drive should be open?

And as for Lee Vandervis, his blog states 'November 8 2011 .. WE ARE BROKE' Clearly not that broke, Lee!

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Dart EngineeringQueenstownIndustrial Engineering
St Clair Four SquareDunedinSupermarkets
Mayfair Costume HireDunedinEntertainment Equipment
Morgan & Pollard (Architecture, Landscapes, Construction)QueenstownArchitects & Architectural Designers