The Canadian judge at the centre of a scathing attack on
his report on David Bain's compensation claim has hit back at
the Minister of Justice.
The New Zealand Herald revealed in September that Justice Ian
Binnie's report had concluded that, on the balance of
probabilities, Mr Bain was innocent of murdering his parents,
brother and two sisters in Dunedin in 1995, for which he
served 13 years' imprisonment.
However, Justice Minister Judith Collins has rejected his
report, saying it appeared to contain assumptions based on
incorrect facts, and showed a misunderstanding of New Zealand
The report lacked a "robustness of reasoning used to justify
its conclusions" and should be reviewed, she said.
From Geneva, Justice Binnie today released a statement from
Geneva hitting back at her criticisms.
"The language of the press release shows it to be a political
document which, given that the minister is engaged in a
political exercise, is not surprising. "However I expected
the minister to follow a fair and even handed process leading
up to that political decision," he said.
In his statement, Justice Binnie also said it was unfair his
report had not been shown to "the party most directly
affected" - David Bain.
"The minister of course is free to seek advice wherever she
wants but if she wanted input from the actual parties to the
compensation inquiry (as distinguished from input from her
colleagues or other persons with no axe to grind) she should
surely have sought input from both sides. There may be much
in my report that Mr Bain disagrees with. He doesn't know
because he hasn't seen it."
New Zealanders had strong views about the David Bain case and
most would want his compensation claim for wrongful
conviction and imprisonment dealt with in an even-handed and
fair way, said Justice Binnie.
In response to claims his report contained assumptions based
on incorrect facts and a misunderstanding of New Zealand law,
Justice Binnie said he received input from a "distinguished
and totally independent New Zealand lawyer".
"Whatever else New Zealand law states, it is certainly well
established that it is most improper for 'a client',
especially a legally trained client, to attack publicly a
lawyer's advice while simultaneously claiming privilege to
protect from disclosure the advice that is being attacked. I
would expect that the Minister, as a former Auckland tax
lawyer, would be well aware of this principle."
Ms Collins said yesterday the report needed to be peer
reviewed by New Zealand QC and former High Court Judge Robert
She said she raised concerns directly with Justice Binnie at
a meeting on September 13 at which Justice Secretary Andrew
Bridgeman was present.
"I advised him I would be getting the matter peer reviewed."
Justice Binnie said he had no issue with his report being
Mr Bain is asking the Ombudsman to intervene in his claim for
compensation to direct Ms Collins to release the report to
Justice Binnie reportedly received $413,764 for his
professional services and expenses.
Prime Minister John Key today acknowledged the costs
associated with the process but it was "really important that
we get it right so that is really a small price to pay," he
said on TV3's Firstline.
Mr Bain's longtime advocate Joe Karam said the process was an
"affront to natural justice".
He had spoken to Mr Bain last weekend and said he was "very,