An entirely
smoke-free hospital campus was an unrealistic concept and
only served to push smokers out on to the footpath, Otago
District Health Board chairman says.
The smoke-free philosophy had to be balanced with common
sense, he said.
As he walked through Dunedin Hospital's main entrance to
attend yesterday's hospital advisory committee meeting he had
to pluck a "still glowing ember" from his jacket, thrown from
a patient standing with a smoke in one hand and a drip in the
other, Mr Thomson said.
"We should be doing everything we can to assist patients who
come in who have an addiction, but that doesn't mean we
should be blind.
"There are some people who are going to drag themselves down
there to have a smoke and it is not fair that they should
have to walk that gauntlet."
It needed to be accepted some people were going to smoke and
if a smoking area was provided at Dunedin and Wakari
Hospitals they could be directed towards it, he said.
Mr Thomson was commenting on a letter from the Ministry of
Health encouraging health boards to make their entire
campuses for mental health inpatient services smoke-free.
"If we make the grounds smoke-free, all that is going to
happen is they will move six inches further out on to the
footpath. We just need to be sensible about it," Mr Thomson
said.
The letter, from ministry acting director of mental health Dr
Charles Hornabrook and national director tobacco control Dr
Ashley Bloomfield said there had been much debate about the
issue in New Zealand, but legal advice sought by the ministry
said mental health service users who were compulsorily
detained did not have an inviolable "right" to smoke.
Smoking rates were much higher among mental health service
users than the general population and they bore a
disproportionate burden of tobacco-related illness and early
death, the letter said.
Board member John Adams said it was not just patients smoking
outside hospital entrances, but staff as well.
Perhaps "some sort of outdoor smoking area" was needed, he
said.
Mr Thomson said he understood the matter was under
investigation.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.