Robin Bates sums up in the High Court at Christchurch
yesterday. Photo by The Press.
Clayton Weatherston made a deliberate, calm and
premeditated decision to kill or mutilate Sophie Elliott,
either before he went to her house or shortly afterwards, the
jury hearing his trial on a murder charge has been told.
Weatherston (33), a former University of Otago economics
tutor, denies murdering Miss Elliott, his 22-year-old
ex-girlfriend at her Ravensbourne home on January 9 last
year.
He stabbed or cut her 216 times in what the Crown says was a
persistent, focused and determined attack, disfiguring and
mutilating areas of her physical and sexual attractiveness.
And while the defence claimed Weatherston lost control under
provocation when attacked by Sophie, Crown counsel Robin
Bates said in his closing address yesterday there was nothing
amounting to provocation.
They could not believe anything Weatherston said about the
events leading up to the killing.
"Everywhere you look, where he's done something that reflects
badly on him, he blames others," Mr Bates said.
"The particular trait of lying to avoid responsibility he
seems to have in abundance."
Mr Bates pointed to the way Weatherston tried to blame the
former girlfriend he assaulted for the particular incident.
Yet one of the psychiatrists who talked to her described her
as intelligent, sensitive and "reluctant to embellish
anything".
Weatherston, when he gave his account of the incident, had
simply been "rewriting the script", turning it around to take
the blame away from himself, Mr Bates said.
He tried to portray himself as a victim, as inexperienced, in
the relationship with Miss Elliott, but he was 31 at the
time, had been in several relationships and had "significant
experience".
It was "totally wrong" to portray him as vulnerable and
controlled by the situation, when comparing him to Miss
Elliott at 22, Mr Bates said.
The accused's tendency to blame others was apparent in his
disputes at the university, Mr Bates said.
On December 27, when Miss Elliott came to his flat they had
an argument, and he made a list of her faults, assaulted her
and, from what she told her mother and her friends, tried to
rape her.
She said he told her she had an ugly chin, her eyes were too
far apart, and went into specific details about areas of her
body, something she found very upsetting.
Weatherston's version of the incident had been "a bit of
pushing and shoving".
On January 7, when she challenged him in his office in the
Commerce Building about what had happened on December 27, he
denied anything had happened and said people would think she
was crazy if she said anything, that he had been telling them
she had psychological issues.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.