By the time he killed Sophie Elliott on January 9 last year,
former economics tutor Clayton Weatherston was like "a coiled
spring", his lawyer, Judith Ablett-Kerr, told the jury in her
three-hour closing address yesterday
And the trigger that released that spring was what occurred
between him and Miss Elliott in her bedroom when she, in
anger and frustration, made insulting remarks about his
family, responded to his accusation of infidelity and the
need for STD tests and lost the plot herself.
She yelled out "F... you, Clayton" and attacked him with
scissors, knocking his glasses off.
Far from being a calm and premeditated attack, Weatherston's
response was spontaneous - "horrific but spontaneous" -
because of what had gone on before in the relationship and
because of the "trigger" in the bedroom.
The Crown accused Weatherston of not taking responsibility
for anything, but he had pleaded guilty to manslaughter, a
crime second only to murder.
He had accepted responsibility for assaulting his former
partner.
Mrs Ablett-Kerr suggested traces of Miss Elliott's blood
found on the inside of Weatherston's laptop bag created "a
difficulty for the Crown".
They meant the knife had been removed from the bag only after
Miss Elliott had started bleeding.
The Crown tried to suggest Weatherston had brought scissors
with him to the house as well as the knife, but that
allegation was later withdrawn.
The issue for them was whether Weatherston was a cold-blooded
premeditated killer, or someone who, as a result of
provocation, lost his self-control and committed "this
terrible act", Mrs Ablett-Kerr told the jurors.
The defence case was very clear - that he was provoked by the
emotional pain of the torrid and tumultuous relationship he
had experienced over those months and which he was
ill-equipped to deal with because or his own personality
makeup.
The Crown said there was no evidence of a downward spiral in
Weatherston's condition, and that by January 8 he was having
discussions with friends and colleagues about the future but
that somehow, on January 9 he woke up "this person with no
personality disorders" on his birthday and decided: "Today I
will go and kill Sophie Elliott".
Commonsense would tell them "this man is not normal", Mrs
Ablett-Kerr said.
Weatherston was a man who was psychologically challenged
because of his personality.
"But he's not a psychopath, not a schizophrenic, not on P.
"It doesn't make sense", she said.
What caused the incident on January 9 was Miss Elliott
attacking him with scissors, causing him to lose control and
in the context of what had happened earlier in the
relationship "and that was pretty horrific in itself".
Also on his mind was the question of what damage Miss
Elliott's supervisor Robert Alexander could do to his job
application.
He suspected Sophie would tell Dr Alexander what had happened
during incidents on December 27 and January 7.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.