The Crown Law Office is conducting a review of internet
publication, after recent cases raised questions over
contempt of court and suppression order breaches.
Debate was sparked during Clayton Weatherston's murder trial
this year when social networking websites posted comments
from people assuming his guilt.
A Facebook page was created entitled "Clayton Weatherston is
a murderer". Website Kiwiblog also had opinions posted about
the former university tutor's guilt.
The Crown Law Office is investigating both groups to
determine if there was any contempt of court.
The investigation was part of a larger look at the internet
and how it was used during court trials.
"This is just an ongoing look at these matters to try and get
some sort of idea on where things can go," a Crown Law Office
spokeswoman told NZPA.
"But as you are aware, it's extremely difficult." The
spokeswoman pointed to the legal wrangle after beekeeper Ken
Richards died in 1994 when an army-built bridge collapsed on
the Keith and Margaret Berryman's King Country farm.
A coroner's inquest largely blamed the Berrymans for the
bridge collapse, after the army told the coroner "there was
nothing in the entire construction of the bridge that
contributed to the accident".
The army made this statement even though their "Butcher
Report", had in fact found a "litany of failing" in the
bridge's design and construction.
That report was not made available to the coroner.
Their lawyer Rob Moodie later released the report to TVNZ and
published it on the internet, prompting contempt proceedings
against him by the solicitor-general.
Dr Moodie posted the report onto an overseas service
provider, which "you don't have any control over", the
spokeswoman said.
"So it's a wider issue that is going to take some time in
looking at." Suppressed information was also posted on the
internet during the trial of three police officers, including
former assistant commissioner Clint Rickards, on historical
sex offences.
The spokeswoman would not say what options the office could
take, but it would closely monitor the internet for further
breaches.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.