Click photo to enlarge
David Davies.
The Welshman head-hunted to manage the Forsyth Barr
Stadium in Dunedin is set to become the Dunedin City Council's
second highest-paid employee.
David Davies (50) has negotiated an annual salary of up to
$250,000 for his role as chief executive of Dunedin Venues
Management Ltd (DVML), the company formed by the council to
run the stadium and other ratepayer-owned venues.
The salary package - including an at-risk portion linked to
performance - is second behind chief executive Jim Harland's
$335,000 a year. Mr Davies will have already cost the council
$21,000 by the time he arrives to take up his new role later
this month - the amount the council has agreed to pay for Mr
Davies and his family to ship their possessions to Dunedin.
That was also believed to be the largest sum paid by the
council to relocate a new employee, Mr Harland confirmed when
contacted.
The council had previously paid relocation costs for staff
recruited offshore, "but not at such a senior level with a
household with them", Mr Harland said.
Details of Mr Davies' salary were released to the Otago
Daily Times by the council following a request under the
Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
His package fell "within the $230,000 - $250,000 band",
including the at-risk portion, the council release said.
Mr Davies, who is still in England, did not respond to
emailed questions about his salary last week.
Speaking last month, he would only say he was being
"appropriately rewarded".
Contacted about the appointment, Mr Harland confirmed Mr
Davies would become the council's second highest-paid member
of staff, behind himself.
Mr Davies' salary was based on the New Zealand conference,
convention and venue market, and benchmarked against other
top venues, including Auckland's Eden Park, and companies
including Christchurch-based events management firm Vbase, he
said.
"It reflects the market . . . and, related to that, it
reflects the commercial responsibilities that go with that."
Those responsibilities included dealing with the lack of
guaranteed income for the Forsyth Barr Stadium - less than
two years before it is due to open in August 2011 - and the
"start-up situation" to be worked through by DVML, he said.
"We wanted the best candidate to do the job, and in our view
we have succeeded in doing that," Mr Harland said.
"It wasn't a question of money . . . There's a business plan
that needs to be achieved.
"You need a leader who can achieve the revenue targets and
ensure expenditure is kept under control."
Mr Davies' experience would be a key factor, Mr Harland said.
He was head-hunted by New Zealand recruitment company
Sheffield Search following an international hunt that
attracted 92 candidates.
His CV included roles as chief executive of the Queens Park
Rangers soccer club and London Wasps rugby club.
He has concert promotion experience, and controlled
Manchester Arena - the largest indoor arena in Europe, with
space for 21,000 people.
Most recently, he was managing director of DHP group,
specialising in the management of bands, venues and events,
including up to 700 concerts a year.
Asked if Mr Davies had taken a pay cut to relocate to
Dunedin, Mr Harland said "you would have to ask him that".
However, he described Mr Davies' package as "a fair starting
point", with Dunedin salaries that were "typically not as
high" offset by lower living costs and the "unique"
opportunity provided by the role.
Mr Harland would not say how big the at-risk portion of Mr
Davies' salary was.
The assessment criteria would be set by the DVML board once
Mr Davies was in Dunedin.
chris.morris@odt.co.nz
Head hunted?
Someone please explain... Why did the CST spend (ratepayer) money to place all those ads (NZ & worldwide) advertising this position? The article says this fellow was head hunted. It would seem that a considerable amount of money was spent on apparently unneeded advertising. Just one more example of the CST flushing ratepayer funds down the drain.
Public welcome
When will there be a public welcoming for Mr David Davies? The happy 'silent majority' can finally be silent no longer and thank him for coming all this way to make a success of the stadium. No matter what the cost of this success to the citizens of Dunedin. If Malcolm Farry and the 11 pro stadium councillors are there, that would be even better. These are the people who decided for the city that the stadium would be built. Stadium supporters can push aside facts that disturb others - that money is being funnelled from the community through rates increases, council costs and utility increases, to fund the stadium.
Seems reasonable
Seems reasonable. For all we know he could be on half this, and the remainder being based on how well the stadium does financially. Pretty hard to comment on these facts, but I'm sure someone from STS will lose the plot over it.
Double standards
As always, according to the pro lot, if it's some sort of pro-stadium comment, then it's 'always fact', if otherwise, it's spin. Glug goes another bottle of Tui. One set of rules for the holier than thou, a-rugby-men. Nothing more, nothing less. All they need now is a real ratepayer's funded 'gravy train' to pull up outside the thing. Well, it's right beside the railway after all, which given that thought, is symbolically correct.
How charitable of Mr Harland to decline a pay increase when he and his cohorts, especially Mr Davies have decided that the city's people, mostly on a tenth or less of his current salary will pay for their 'baby'. Perhaps a pay cut might start to appease.
Seems a bit much
Does seem like a good salary... but if he can generate lots of private income the I'm sure it will be worth it.
Private income
If his job is to generate private income he should be paid directly by those who stand to profit - just like a stadium designed as a venue for a private team should be privately funded by those who stand to profit from it. If it really was good for the local economy we would see representatives of local business asking to be taxed more to pay for it. So far the Chamber of Commerce and Business Round Table have been silent on the issue.
Otherwise all that's happening is that the City Council is dipping into ratepayer's pockets with the goal of transferring the contents to those private companies who's incomes you value so much.
Stadium boss's salary
If I'd have known that the council had that much money to pay someone to look after the stadium then I'd have applied for the job... and saved the ratepayers $21K as a matter of duty. I wonder if the ODT can use the official information act to find out the "market" rate for someone in this position? Nothing short of being an outstanding success with be expected of Mr Davies now and in a way I feel a bit sorry for the guy as he will be in the hot seat and people will be watching his every move. Perhaps the high retainer is to compensate for the stress of the situation? Fingers crossed he is worth what he is being paid in the sense that he can make the stadium profitable.