The Dunedin City Council says an ultra-fast broadband
network, dedicated to advanced research in New Zealand, is
"underutilised" and should be opened up to the public.
Such a move could help bring truly rapid broadband to the
city, providing data transfer speeds of up to 10 gigabits a
second - about 2500 times the speed of a standard broadband
connection.
Cr Dave Cull, chairman of the Dunedin City Council's digital
strategy steering group, floated the idea in a letter to
Communications and Information Technology Minister Steven
Joyce on November 9.
His letter said the speeds that could be made available for
wider use would "tower" over what was commercially available,
and the council intended to investigate how use of the
network could be "better leveraged".
That included exploring ways of expanding eligibility for
membership of the network, which would help Dunedin improve
its digital capabilities, Cr Cull said.
Contacted by the Otago Daily Times yesterday, Cr Cull said
the proposal would need further consideration by the
council's digital steering group.
"What we do know is it's extremely fast and it's got a huge
capacity and it's utilised about 5%.
"It seems to be a big facility being underutilised," he said.
The private network - Kiwi Advanced Research and Education
Network (Karen) - was launched in 2006 to service
universities and other education and research-oriented
organisations.
It was operated by Research and Education Advanced Network
New Zealand Ltd, a Crown-owned company, and linked to 69
organisations across the country, including the University of
Otago and Invermay Agricultural Centre.
The Government invested $43 million in the project, and a
further $16 million earlier this year to extend the network's
use to 2013.
The network cost about $12 million annually to run.
A Research and Education Advanced Network spokeswoman said
no-one was available yesterday to comment on Cr Cull's
suggestion.
The Karen website said capacity on the network was
overprovisioned to guarantee reliability and performance.
Cr Cull's suggestion was part of a push by the council
toencourage the development of high-speed broadband networks
and content within the city.
The council's steering group, including representatives from
the health, business, education and information technology
sectors, was formed earlier this year and had begun work on a
digital communications strategy.
A draft was expected to be finished by March or April next
year, and would examine a host of issues relating to the
development of high-speed broadband infrastructure and access
to content in the city, he said.
The council had allocated $50,000 for the development of the
strategy, and earlier this week Effectus Ltd was named as
consultant to work on the strategy.
Aurora Energy Ltd, a council-controlled organisation, had
developed a 10km trial fibre broadband network in the inner
city which was trading as the Flute Network and had attracted
10 customers.
The company had also applied to become a partner in the
Government's $1.5 billion ultra-fast broadband investment
initiative.
Cr Cull said there was much work still to be done, including
a better understanding of the objectives the city should aim
for in the development of broadband infrastructure.
Access to the Karen network - if it came about - would be
only one part of the puzzle, he said.
chris.morris@odt.co.nz
The Karen network
- What: An ultra-fast broadband network launched in 2006.
- Who for: Set up to service universities and research
organisations.
- Cost so far: $59 million with $12 million annual running
costs.
- Proposal: Open up to public use in Dunedin.
Political gimmick
The DCC and Central Government are pursuing the wrong goals. The Ultra Fast Broadband Initiative is a political gimmick and isn't the solution to any real problem. Affordability is the barrier preventing users from moving from dial-up to broadband. Providing high-speed, high-cost access, will not help affordability and broadband penetration. One reason that the cost of broadband is too much for many, is because of the high DCC rates inflicted on us. This will become much worse as the effects of the DCC Debt Crisis kicks in over the next few years. Because the DCC is attracted to loss-making businesses, their interference in this area can only be bad for renters, ratepayers and internet users.
Infrastructure ...
I think that basic infrastructure is something that the council should be involved with - in this case we've reached the point where our antique copper can't provide us with any more speed - that means digging up the streets and laying fibre. That's a large initial capital cost but once conduit has been laid pulling more fibre is cheap.
Waiting for Telecom/Chorus to come and do it is a mistake - they can't afford to pull fibre everywhere and they'll invest in FTTH in the places where they'll initially make the most money - that means downtown in the bigger cities and the more well to do suburbs. Ideally we want some competition in this business - just depending on Telecom will keep our local internet charges high.
What I don't think the DCC should do is get into the ISP or content business - more like Chorus they should provide dark fibre to end users and ISPs.
The problem of course is that we've spent a third of a billion dollars on an expensive money losing luxury and as a result our local economy will suffer because we can't afford the infrastructure that other competing centres can.
now we're talking
Compliments to the DCC in their forward thinking regarding the net and the utilisation of services already in place ..... it's a no brainer - march forward - you might get re-elected on this.