Dunedin pharmacist Don
Anderson says he has signed a contract with the Otago
District Health Board, but did so under duress.
The duress allegation has been denied by the board, which
says he has not provided sufficient grounds " in fact or in
law" to establish any claims of duress.
Earlier this year, Mr Anderson publicly advised he wanted to
continue charging his customers an across-the-board fee to
cover extra services, something expressly forbidden in the
new pharmacy services agreement.
He now plans to bill the board at the end of each month for
those extra services which he has provided, but for which
patients have been unwilling or unable to pay .
After two days he had three items on the list, totalling
$17.60, where people were unable to pay for legitimate extra
work he had to undertake on prescriptions.
Under the contract, if a pharmacist has to charge for an
extra service, such as the time taken to correct a
prescription, the charge is to be made to the patient
concerned. (Pharmacists are paid a standard dispensing fee of
$5.30 which did not increase in the new agreement.)
Mr Anderson argued it was fairer to have a small charge
across the board as he had done for about three years,
because in some instances legitimate extra charges for extra
services, could be as high as $170.
He was expecting many more arguments with patients now he
could no longer make a blanket charge and had to ask
individual patients for payment for extra services provided
in the processing of their prescriptions.
He also considered that not being allowed to charge a small
blanket fee meant he was not able to comply with his
professional code of ethics which required him to be doing
the best for his customers. His attempt to get the board to
agree to a contract variation allowing him to administer a
blanket charge, for which he said he had considerable public
support, faltered.
The only reason the board could proffer for this was the need
for national consistency and that the terms of the agreement
had been agreed nationally in discussions between District
Health Boards New Zealand and the New Zealand Pharmacy Guild,
he said.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.