Building makes way for cricket

Dunedin should have a cricket field big enough to host major tests from next year, after a compromise was hammered out between the Dunedin City Council and the New Zealand Historic Places Trust.

• Big is good - Dykes 

The compromise means the trust will support the council's resource consent application to demolish part of the protected historic former art gallery at Logan Park, as long as the council places a binding covenant on its title ensuring the remainder of the building stays put.

The $5 million project, with resource consent to be lodged next week, would allow the University Oval to be expanded to allow for an outfield about the size of Wellington's Basin Reserve.

The agreement would also mean the Sargood Wing, at the Caledonian end of the building, now the home of the New Zealand Academy of Sport (South Island), would make way for an outdoor seating area.

The academy and the Highlanders rugby team, which also uses the building, are expected to move, with the Forsyth Barr Stadium being proposed as their new base.

While the organisations involved lauded the plan as the best way forward, Dunedin historian Peter Entwisle said yesterday it was "remarkable" the trust had agreed to the partial demolition of a category 1 historic building.

"It's like saying the Great Pyramid of Giza is an important building, but we don't need one corner."

The consent application follows extensive negotiations between the council and the trust.

The Sargood Bequest and descendants of the Sargood family have also backed the plan.

The former art gallery was built for the 1925 New Zealand and South Seas International Exhibition, and is thought to be the only surviving in-situ building from any of the exhibitions in New Zealand.

It is a registered historic building, and recognised on the council's district plan.

Two of the building's bays were removed in 2001 to expand the University Oval.

The plan to apply for resource consent was announced at a press conference yesterday, presented by representatives of both the council and the trust.

Cr Paul Hudson said that following a "long, slow, drawn out process", the historic places trust supported the proposal.

Trust Otago-Southland area manager Owen Graham said the loss of any part of the building was an important matter for the trust, but so was ensuring options for its survival and ongoing use.

"While the full retention of this iconic Dunedin landmark would have been the ideal outcome, this is a practical and pragmatic decision made with the council that opens the way for the continued use of the building as part of the wider community," he said.

The Sargood Wing, a later addition, would be mostly demolished, with some or all of the walls kept to provide a sheltered area that could be used for events associated with cricket, or for weddings and other events.

A conservation architect said saving the original building was more important than retaining the Sargood Wing, council community life general manager Graeme Hall said.

A decision on the consent was expected in August, with demolition next year.

The $5 million for the project is allowed for in the annual plan.

 

here's a picture

It's the last remaining part of this, which does seem quite special, attractive and aesthetically pleasing. Most exhibition structures were intended to be temporary in nature (including the Eiffel Tower!), and so I suspect it originally had a more extravagant facade. The inside of the remaining building is more impressive, however. Whether you feel that justifies its retention, I don't know, but it was part of something amazing.

Good riddance, no - poor reading skills...

... and no background knowledge of the history of our city, which is a pity since we live in a city whose history may be brief by, say, European standards but is rich in interest to those whose minds are willing to encompass more than sports and what's on telly.
In the article this sentence, "The former art gallery was built for the 1925 New Zealand and South Seas International Exhibition, and is thought to be the only surviving in-situ building from any of the exhibitions in New Zealand", tells why it is historic and part of Dunedin's heritage. The Exhibition was a huge event, enormously important to the new city and NZ as a whole.
It went on over a period much longer than an Olympic Games, attracted far more people than a World Cup, and they were of all kinds of interests, buyers and sellers of products as well as the public who went over and over to enjoy the entertainments. It was a showcase for producers large and small. It is the reason Logan Park ceased to be Lake Logan - it was drained and filled to make a venue for the Exhibition's veritable township of buildings.

explain

Kinda agree Funkie but first I would like someone to explain in full what apart from its age is so special about it. It's hardly attractive or aesthically pleasing.

Good riddance

The building is hardly reflective of Dunedin and the only thing it is comparable to an WW II army barrack. Historic is stretching it to the nth degree also. Complete demolition would have been a far cheaper option.

cow corner

Speak for yourself. I myself can't get enough of it. I am fizzing, can't wait for the Barmy Army to set up camp.

Interesting comparison

I'm sorry, did Peter Entwisle just compare this building to the Great Pyramid of Giza? I think he may be getting a little excited here about a wing of a building which was only added as an extra wing to the original building.

I think it's a credit to the Historic Places Trust and to Otago Cricket that they have worked out a compromise to ensure the Main Art Gallery is retained while allowing Dunedin to move towards hosting international cricket on a more regular basis - a sign that Dunedin is doing its best to get itself on the map.

Show us the money

So where's the money coming from? Obviously the cricket people are the ones who benefit, but where is this $5m coming from? Is this just another case of big sport getting the DCC to rifle around in the ratespayer's pockets to build them a better venue? if so we've had enough.

If cricket wants a bigger ground they can go out and raise the money they need - up the fees they charge Sky, or raise their admission prices to pay for it.

We'll have more money available for sport when we've paid off the stadium debt.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Cottage BakehouseDunedinBakeries
Dunedin Motor Homes & AccessoriesDunedin
Direct Roofing CompanyDunedinRoofers
MastertradeOamaruPlumbers