"Ginger Rogers did everything Fred Astaire did, except
backwards and in high heels."
The dancing relationship between Fred Astaire and Ginger
Rogers provides an analogy for the life of a farming woman.
While Ginger Rogers was certainly not wearing Red Bands, she
was crucial to the dancing duo, following Fred's lead while
he manoeuvred her into place.
Likewise, the farm woman has traditionally been the
supportive farmer's wife, following her husband's lead while
assisting him with the running of the family farm; a socially
determined, traditionally accepted position made evident to
me after interviewing South Island farm women about their
lives.
However, do not be naive in assuming that farm women, as a
consequence of their apparent subordination, do not have a
significant influence on the on-farm decision-making process.
Indeed, farm women need to be recognised and acknowledged for
their adroitness in covertly influencing on-farm
decision-making.
One key mechanism that women employ to influence decisions is
via subtle suggestion, as illustrated by a Waitaki woman who
commented: "I put the idea in his head and then leave it to
percolate for a few months and, sure enough, he'll come back
and say `Hey, I've got this great idea!'."
Another successful method utilised to indirectly affect
decision-making is via their role as the Chief Information
Officer.
As information gatekeepers, women indirectly influence the
decision-making process by filtering, reading, processing and
communicating the information that their partner uses to make
an informed decision.
A Southland woman explained: "Like all ladies, I get the mail
and filter it - I chuck what goes in the bin and I'll give
him what relates to him."
Similarly, another Southland woman said: "If there's a trial
report, he'll want me to read the report and give him a
sum-up.
"He hates reading big screeds of material. Currently, I'm
finding out how to do an effluent system."
These narratives also highlight that as information
gatekeepers, women not only determine what information is
employed when making decisions but the source of the
information.
Women will not use information from sources they do not trust
or respect.
Many farm industry organisations and representatives are
still dismissive of women, some rural professionals failing
to accept the notion that women can be farmers.
One woman explained: "The fertiliser rep' wouldn't deal with
me! I'd ring up and say, look we want X amount of urea and
they would say for me to get Paul to ring them!"They changed
fertiliser suppliers!
Similarly, an Otago woman noted: "Bob would leave a note
requesting I ring a contractor, but the contractor would not
deal with me. He'd go, 'Get your husband to ring me!"' They
have a new contractor.
Rural bankers, contractors, fertiliser companies and other
farmer providers need to pay heed; their futures frequently
rest on the decisions made by her, not a him! Snub women at
your peril.
For farming to survive through the 21st century women need
not only to be acknowledged as farmers but also as crucial to
farming's continued existence.
The draconian, chauvinist paradigms which still prevail in
the masculine-dominated cubicles of the agricultural sector
need to be culled or at least docked for rural New Zealand to
persevere into the 22nd century.
Dr Sue Peoples is a social scientist working with
the University of Otago's Centre for the Study of
Agriculture, Food and Environment.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.