Cantabrians might be subjected to frightening earthquake
aftershocks for weeks yet.
A large, shallow 5.1-magnitude aftershock, which hit at
7.49am yesterday, left residents shaken and caused more
structural damage. It was the largest of more than 15
aftershocks in the region yesterday.
"My guts is just churning up here. When will this thing end?
It is like living in a maelstrom," Christchurch Mayor Bob
Parker said.
"We were starting to think, maybe, just maybe, we are over
the worst of this, and now we have had this shocking event.
This is a hammer-blow to the spirit of a lot of people."
Yesterday, too, came news that Treasury has doubled its
estimate of the Canterbury earthquake damage cost - to $4
billion.
Treasury gave an estimate of $2 billion at the weekend, but
its secretary, John Whitehead, told media that was in
relation to Earthquake Commission (EQC) liabilities only.
"The cost faced by the EQC, individuals, and insurance costs
will probably be of the order of $4 billion," Mr Whitehead
said.
The violent jolt yesterday occurred near Lyttelton Harbour,
forcing the closure of the Lyttelton to Christchurch tunnel
until 11.30am, after structural checks determined that only
superficial damage had occurred.
Families in suburbs near Lyttelton Harbour were evacuated
from their homes, which were worse hit yesterday than by the
main quake on Saturday.
Hazel O'Leary (94) left the home she built in 1950 and is
unlikely to return.
The Art Deco home, in Cashmere, was not damaged in Saturday's
quake, but cracks split open her walls yesterday. A fracture
rings the house along its foundations.
Her son, Jim O'Leary, who lives next door, said the cracks
painted a clear picture of what had happened.
"It was huge, just a big bang up and down, boom boom. It was
over in five seconds. The house was jolted up and fell back
down again," Mr O'Leary said.
"This was the scariest one. We were just getting over it and
this happens again. Saturday's went on rolling for a long
time, but this was violent."
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.