Future management of millions of cards containing newborns'
blood droplets has been spelled out after four years of
sometimes contentious discussion.
The policy on the national newborn metabolic screening
programme, to be released today, shows compromises have been
made on some of the controversial issues surrounding the
42-year-old scheme.
The policy announcement follows the Government's decision
last year, which was not publicised, to store the cards
indefinitely rather than destroy them or keep them for a
limited time.
Researchers have won the argument over the type of informed
consent to be given by parents. It will be verbal, not
written as some consumer groups sought.
Parents will have the chance to decide whether they want
cards stored indefinitely or returned after initial testing.
The possible use of the cards for research has been one of
the keenly debated issues, mostly behind the scenes, since
public consultation began the debate in 2007.
Some argued it was unethical that samples collected for one
purpose be used for others and sought destruction of the
"unconsented" collection, while others considered, with
appropriate rules, extra use of the cards could be supported.
Under the new policy, controls on the use of cards collected
before June this year are tighter than some researchers might
have wanted.
Population researchers wanting to use blood on cards
collected before June will need to have individuals' written
consent and ethics committee approval before their requests
will be considered by the programme's governance team.
Any proposal using blood collected after June must first be
approved by an ethics committee and that will then be
reviewed by the programme's governance team. Written
permission from the Ministry of Health is also required for
any research projects.
Since 1969, most babies in New Zealand have had blood tests
which screen for more than 20 rare metabolic disorders.
What many people do not realise is that the cards, after
being tested for these conditions, have been retained in
storage in Auckland. Until now, no consent had been given for
this, although people could ask for their cards to be
returned.
To date, requests from researchers wanting to use residual
blood left after testing have been turned down. At the
moment, the national screening unit does not have any
research proposals before it.
Under the new policy, collection of the blood for testing for
specific metabolic disorders is listed as the primary purpose
of the programme, but secondary uses are also listed,
including research.
Stored blood samples cannot be used to identify criminals
unless there is a court order, something which has never
occurred in the history of the programme. (The Ministry of
Health and police have had a memorandum of understanding
allowing the cards to be used for identifying dead or missing
victims of disasters or crimes, under certain conditions.)
Asked what attempt there would be to inform people ignorant
of the fact their cards had been stored, a national screening
unit spokeswoman said, as part of its ongoing education, the
unit communicated key messages about the programme to various
organisations and practitioners.
This could include articles in parenting magazines and
professional or-ganisation news-letters.
Up-to-date information would be published on the unit website
and web links sent out widely to consumer, professional and
health provider organisations.
There will be a governance team for the screening programme,
which will include representatives from a variety of
organisations, others who have expertise in newborn screening
and some members of the programme's advisory group.
Once membership of the group was settled that information
would be on the NSU website, the spokeswoman said.
• Complaints by the Otago Daily Times to the Office of
the Ombudsmen over refusals by the Minister of Health, Tony
Ryall, to release the draft protocols documents for the
programme and the Cabinet paper informing last year's
decision on the indefinite storage of the cards are yet to be
resolved.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.