Kiwi holidaymakers and business travellers to Australia will
soon face full-body scans or be banned from flying, in a
radical security overhaul that could create greater airport
delays.
Australia's international airports will introduce the
scanners in a A$28 million upgrade proposed under federal
law, and approved by privacy watchdogs.
The new technology had successful trials in Sydney and
Melbourne last year, but aviation experts are concerned that
their expanded use could create greater queues in Australian
terminals.
New Zealanders make nearly a million trips across the ditch a
year for business and holidays, and flights to Australia
account for nearly half of our overseas travel.
Holidaymakers and business travellers would face the scans as
they departed Australia to return home.
Transport Minister Gerry Brownlee said the efficacy of the
new technology was not yet known, and he would not rush to
judgement before the scanners were rolled out in July.
He also confirmed that New Zealand's international airports
would not being following suit just yet.
"We have a different security profile to Australia's but we
would be monitoring what happens once they do establish these
things.
"Everyone would want to have as secure arrangement as
possible but it is a balance between super security and
travel inconvenience as far as we're concerned.''
Under new laws introduced this week it will be mandatory for
any passenger selected to participate in a full-body scan.
This amendment closed a loophole which allowed passengers to
request a pat-down instead.
Only passengers with serious medical conditions will be
exempted from the scans.
Australian Transport Minister Anthony Albanese told
Australian media that compulsory body scans were necessary to
ensure the safety of airports.
"I think the public understands that we live in a world where
there are threats to our security, and experience shows they
want the peace of mind that comes with knowing government is
doing all it can,'' he said.
The government reassured travellers that they would not
appear nude on screen, but would instead appear as a
stick-figure-like image. This contrasted with some of the
controversial scanners used in the United States which showed
passengers with transparent clothing.
The government said the US-made scanners were the most
sophisticated available, and would detect metallic and
non-metallic items while emitting negligible radiation.
Mr Albanese said the strength of the scanners' radio signal
was similar to an average mobile phone call.
Aviation commentator Peter Clark said some of the scanners
trialled in the United States were time-consuming and had
been criticised by passengers as overly intrusive, even if
they did not show passengers as virtually naked.
"This now throws in another cost, another delay, another
inconvenience to passengers. They're struggling with this in
the United States because of the human rights aspect of it.
"I'm 100 per cent for safety and security, but how far do we
go? Do we need to walk through the airport naked?''
He said the initiative seemed to go against recent
initiatives to ease travel between Australia and New Zealand.
"Only last week we see John Key with [Australian Prime
Minister] Julia Gillard trying to get passport-free travel
across the Tasman, and while this [law change] might mean
people do not have to be profiled, it really does seem to
contradict this initiative.''
The scanners will be rolled out at eight international
airports in Adelaide, Brisbane, Cairns, Gold Coast,
Melbourne, Perth and Sydney.
In contrast, New Zealand's international airports depended
less on scanning, and used alternative security measures such
as passenger profiling.
New Zealand and Australian passport holders, who were
considered low risk, could bypass the luggage X-ray machines
as they exited Customs.
If the full body screening technology was ever introduced in
New Zealand, Privacy Commissioner Marie Shroff has said
extensive public consultation would need to take place
beforehand.
A Unisys Security Index study showed that the majority of New
Zealanders would have no problem with full-body scanners at
airports. Two-thirds of respondents to the survey said they
were happy to sacrifice some privacy for increased security.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.