All 73 hot air balloons operating in New Zealand will be
urgently checked for safety issues, after a preliminary
report into the Carterton balloon crash found the balloon may
not have met maintenance requirements.
The Transport Accident Investigation Commission (TAIC) has
today released preliminary findings into the incident, with
an urgent recommendation that New Zealand's 74 hot air
balloons be checked for airworthiness.
Earlier today TAIC chief commissioner John Marshall QC, said
it was too early to say whether maintenance issues actually
contributed to the accident, but evidence pointed towards
substandard maintenance of the Early Morning Balloons Ltd
balloon involved.
"Evidence gathered by our investigators suggests the
balloon's maintenance may not have complied with civil
aviation rules. When an aircraft is not maintained in
accordance with those rules then it would not meet the
standard for `airworthy condition'.''
The evidence did not relate to examination of the balloon
wreckage, he said.
So far, the investigation has singled out three incidents of
non-compliance before the incident.
Firstly, the manufacturer appeared to not be using the
mandatory "grab test'' to test the strength of the material
that makes up the part of the balloon holding the hot air.
Secondly, the required procedure for inspecting the balloon's
burners and liquefied petroleum gas fuel system was not
followed.
And finally, the balloon log book did not show that all the
necessary airworthiness orders for balloons in New Zealand
had been assessed.
The 10 passengers and pilot on board the balloon died when it
struck powerlines in Carterton and burst into flames during
an early-morning flight over Wairarapa on January 7.
The tragedy has been described as the worst aviation disaster
since the Erebus crash in 1979.
At a press conference this afternoon, TAIC chief commissioner
John Marshall QC said he would have refused to get into the
basket had he been aware of the safety issues.
"I wouldn't have gone up in the balloon anyway,'' he said.
"If I had known - as a person about to get in a balloon -
that maintenance requirements had not been complied with,
obviously, personally, I would not want to get in that
balloon.''
Last week the TAIC recommended the Civil Aviation Authority
(CAA) director check hot air balloon maintainers' practices
and the airworthiness of the remaining 73 hot air balloons
across the country.
"Because of the concern that these issues might go wider than
the balloon lost with 11 lives in January, the commission
last Wednesday issued an urgent safety recommendation which
we are making public today after having given the CAA
director the opportunity to consider it and put in place his
response,'' said Mr Marshall.
Now all 73 balloons in New Zealand, which were maintained by
seven approved people or organisations, were being
investigated.
"In our view this is a matter that needs to be investigated
to ensure public confidence in the ballooning industry, which
I'm sure the ballooning industry will welcome.''
Chief inspector Tim Burfoot said he was not aware of any
balloons which had been grounded as a result of these initial
recommendations.
The TAIC investigation into the disaster continues. An
interim inquiry report describing what happened was expected
within the next few months, he said.
A final inquiry report analysing why the event unfolded as it
did, and what might be done in order to reduce the chance of
a recurrence, was expected early next year.
However, if any significant issues were found along the
course of the investigation, there would be an immediate call
for action to address the issues, Mr Marshall said.
In response to the TAIC's initial findings, the CAA has
launched an investigation into the maintenance practices of
the Early Morning Balloons Ltd balloon involved in the
January 7 tragedy. It will also examine maintenance practices
associated with other balloons serviced by the same
maintenance provider.
An initial report documenting the investigation findings is
expected on February 29.
- Hayley Hannan and Hana Garrett-Walker of APNZ
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.