A bizarre legal bid to prosecute a dead man has been thrown
out by a judge today who said the case resembled the famous
Monty Python comedy sketch involving a dead parrot.
The case of two Korean trawler officers accused of dumping
fish at sea was called at Christchurch District Court today.
But while the skipper of Oyang 77, Dae Jun Lee, appeared in
the dock, his co-accused was not present.
Lawyer Mike Sullivan said he was representing the estate of
Soon Ill Hwang, 42, who died in a car crash in China after
charges were laid against him earlier this year.
Mr Sullivan told Judge Gary Macaskill that it was an "unusual
case" because the prosecution, the Ministry for Primary
Industries (MPI), wanted to bring a case against his deceased
client.
He added that Hwang never appeared in court - and even said
he may have died unaware that he had been charged.
Lawyer for MPI, Grant Fletcher told the judge that "there are
still reasons for this prosecution to go ahead".
But a bemused Judge Macaskill replied flatly: "We can't try
dead people."
The judge said the idea was "absurd", sarcastically
suggesting that evidence from the accused could perhaps be
gleaned via seance.
"It reminds me of the Monty Python sketch with the dead
parrot."
He threw out the suggestion that a dead man could be tried,
and suggested that if the MPI wanted to take it further, they
could appeal his decision through the High Court.
"I think the law is absolutely clear and I'm not going to
spend two or three hours dealing with that," Judge Macaskill
said.
A new date was set down to hear legal arguments ahead of the
taking of evidence from Indonesian crew members.
Mr Fletcher raised concerns that there could be "extreme
difficulties" in getting witnesses in New Zealand to give
evidence because they are fishing all over the world.
But Judge Macaskill said it was something the prosecution
"would have to live with".
Lee, 39, denies nine fisheries breaches and has indicated he
will fight the charges.
He did not comment when he left court today.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.