Coke role in death: coroner

Natasha Harris
Natasha Harris
Coca-cola maintains it sells ''safe, quality beverages'', after a coroner found excessive consumption of the soft drink was a ''substantial factor'' in the death of a mother of eight.

Natasha Marie Harris (31), who drank up to 10 litres of Coca-Cola daily - the equivalent of 1kg of sugar - died in her Invercargill home on February 25, 2010.

Yesterday, Otago-Southland coroner David Crerar released his findings, in which she was found to have died from cardiac arrhythmia.

''When all of the available evidence is considered, were it not for the consumption of very large quantities of Coke by Natasha Harris, it is unlikely that she would have died when she died and how she died.''

Mr Crerar recommended health agencies investigate whether warning labels concerning the amount of sugar and caffeine in soft drinks would give sufficient protection to consumers.

At the inquest, Ms Harris' family said, as Coca-Cola had no warning signs, they did not consider it harmful.

Her partner, Christopher Hodgkinson, told the inquest Ms Harris also smoked 30 cigarettes a day and was aware of the warning labels on the packets and the health hazard involved.

One or more of her children were born without enamel on their teeth, and Ms Harris had had her teeth extracted several years ago because of decay, which her family believed was caused by Coca-Cola.

The coroner noted this should have been treated as a health warning by Ms Harris, who did not like going to the doctor.

On most days during the six months before her death, Ms Harris, who was estimated to drink between six and 10 litres of Coca-Cola a day, often vomited in the morning, had little energy, and was a poor eater.

A daily caffeine intake of 400mg or less was considered safe for a healthy adult, but a daily consumption of 500mg could lead to health problems.

A litre of standard Coca-Cola - Ms Harris' preferred drink - contained 97mg of caffeine and therefore she consumed up to 970mg of caffeine each day.

Mr Crerar found: ''On the balance of probabilities, this being the standard required of a coroner in these circumstances, it is more likely than not that the drinking of very large quantities of Coke by Natasha Harris was a substantial factor that contributed to the development of the metabolic imbalances which gave rise to the arrhythmia''.

A copy of his findings would be sent to the Ministry of Health, requesting warning labels on carbonated beverages give sufficient protection to consumers.

''The hazards to the health of the consumers of excessive quantities of sugar and caffeine contained in carbonated beverages could be more clearly emphasised.''

Coca-Cola Oceania yesterday issued a statement noting the coroner was not certain what caused Ms Harris' heart attack, and saying the company was ''disappointed'' he focused on her excessive consumption of Coca-Cola, together with other health and lifestyle factors, as the probable cause of her death. ''This is contrary to the evidence that showed the experts could not agree on the most likely cause.''

The company would not be drawn into the coroner's recommendations concerning labelling, but maintained that ''the safety of our products is paramount, and our promise is to deliver safe, quality beverages''.

''All of our products have a place in an active, healthy lifestyle that includes a sensible, balanced diet and regular physical activity,'' the company said.

A Ministry for Primary Industries spokesman said the coroner's recommendation would be considered as part of a policy review for foods containing caffeine.

Public consultation on the review would take place in April this year.

Cola drinks, including those containing guarana, had to be labelled that they contain caffeine, but not the amount when it was used as a food additive.

Formulated caffeinated beverages containing more than 145mg of caffeine per litre were required to list the amount of caffeine per serve and per 100ml and carry an advisory statement the product was not suitable for children, pregnant or lactating women, or people sensitive to caffeine.

University of Otago National Addiction Centre director Prof Doug Sellman said soft drinks would be ''more accurately described as fat drinks, given the amount of sugar in them''.

He advocated a traffic-light system for food, and ''Coca-Cola along with all other sugar-laden, caffeine-heavy, soft drinks should have a large red health information label on the product, signalling to people the potential harm from overconsuming the product''.

He was also supportive of a special tax on ''red light'' foods, which would effectively limit consumption and provide additional revenue for the government to deal with health issues.

Coronial findings socially responsible

Coroners' reports are made public so that lessons may be learnt from accidental death. Some people don't know the hazards, no matter how much we think they should. It is socially responsible to urge caution with consumer products.


While I feel sorry for Natasha and her family, I find the focus on Coke extremely's as if they rely on the readers of the reports being completely stupid.

1: Why Coke? Any soft drink will cause health affects if consumed in such large quantities. It's not the Coke, it's the sugar and the caffeine (oh and the nicotine and lack of nutritious food).

2: How come there has been such small focus on her 30-a-day smoking habit when those health concerns are so well-known?

3: She hardly unbalanced (or almost non-existant) diet can wreak havoc on your body.

4: Vomiting every morning...I can't see how we can blame Coke just because she didn't lie going to the doctor. This should have been a major cause for concern at the time.

Quite simply she put her own health second and there were consequences. It's sad but true.


'Overconsuming the product'

I recall a story about someone whose skin turned orange, and it was found that this was because on a fanatical "healthy" diet the person was drinking ludicrous amounts of carrot juice.  So while Otago-Southland coroner David Crerar may be on the right track, I think he is in the wrong lane.  It would be better and much simpler to clearly label any foods that can be consumed in eye-watering quantities without adverse effects.

Too much of anything

Why do we continue to try and protect people from themselves. The simple fact is 'anything in excess is dangerous to your Health'. Excessive  exercise , too many bananas, too much water, the list is almost endless. There are many deep seated reasons why someone does or consumes to excess, that is the real story behind this and many other tragic events.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Alan McDonald, Marriage & Funeral CelebrantDunedinWeddings
Jeannie Horn Counselling, Therapy & SupervisionDunedinHealth Specialists
SignguysDunedinSigns & Signwriting
Gourmet Summerfruit LtdRoxburghOrchards