A lobby group on genetically modified food has accused the
Food Safety Authority of "shopping" for advice when a report
it commissioned queried the safety of a variety of GM corn.
The Sustainability Council is calling for changes to the food
safety system after its investigation of advice commissioned
by the authority from the Institute of Environmental Science
and Research (ESR).
Council executive director Simon Terry said an ESR report
written in April last year, after a French study found signs
of organ toxicity in rats fed the "MON863" corn, said there
were toxicological concerns over the corn which could not be
refuted without further study.
But last October, ESR sent a letter to the authority saying
the French study "does not provide a sound scientific
justification for questioning the safety of MON863".
Mr Terry said this showed the authority "shopped" for
alternative advice after the report questioned the corn's
safety.
He said the council's investigations of this and another GM
corn variety showed the food regulatory system had "zero
credibility".
The authority's policy director, Carole Inkster, denied it
shopped around for advice.
She said ESR had withdrawn the report and replaced it with
the October letter.
But ESR's general manager of business development and
marketing, David Talbot, said the report had not been
withdrawn.
"ESR stands by both reports even though they have divergent
scientific opinions. We consider it healthy to ensure
scientific debate in this area."
A spokeswoman for the Food Safety Minister said Lianne
Dalziel had complete confidence in the authority but could
not comment in detail at the time.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.