Air New Zealand has written to the Police Commissioner,
angry at comments by a superintendent that the airline has a
drink-driving problem, which it denied.
The comments from Superintendent John Kelly, Auckland road
policing manager, came in an internal memo to national road
policing manager Paula Rose in December and referred to a
meeting with the airline some 18 months earlier at which
police voiced concerns about four cases of drink-driving in
the year to May 2008. There were also three others in the
past three years that the airline did not know about, TV3
reported tonight.
"As an aside, this may be the tip of the iceberg ... There
may be many others who have not been identified as Air New
Zealand staff or who have been apprehended elsewhere and so
have not come to my attention," Mr Kelly said to Ms Rose.
The memo was released by police to TV3 following an Official
Information Act request.
Air NZ chief executive Rob Fyfe said in a letter to Police
Commissioner Howard Broad today that the comments were
"unsubstantiated and ill considered' from a senior police
officer.
Mr Kelly's speculation that there was a drink-driving problem
at the airline was not substantiated by fact and reflected a
view "guessed at by the inspector on the basis of other cases
which he speculates may exist but he is not aware of.
"I believe Air NZ and the New Zealand public deserve, and
should reasonably expect, a much higher standard of fact and
substance before senior police officers release comments in
the public domain which serve to undermine confidence in Air
NZ and our commitment to the safety of staff and passengers."
TV3 said two of the four employees caught drink-driving were
on their way to work.
One was a pilot, who had been charged with excess breath
alcohol on three previous occasions. A mechanic on his way to
work was 2-1/2 half times the legal limit.
A flight attendant, on the way to work, and dressed in full
Air NZ uniform, was also over the limit and was later fired.
TV3 said the OIA documents showed others had been caught, but
Air NZ bosses did not know who they were, because they
weren't caught on the way to work or in uniform and
identifiable.
They are a mechanic with three breath alcohol convictions in
four years, another pilot and an aircraft engineer.
Mr Fyfe said the four cases mentioned in the year to May 2008
indicated an incident rate of 0.03 percent over the airline's
12,000 employees compared with a rate of 1 percent over the
New Zealand population at large.
"This suggests to me that, rather than a drink-drive problem
at Air NZ, the available facts suggest that the application
of the drug and alcohol policies that are in force...have led
to an improvement in the drink drive culture as compared to
that which is evident across the New Zealand population at
large."
However, he said the airline viewed four cases in 12 months
as four too many and would strive to achieve its target of
zero incidents, through ongoing random testing of all
employees in safety sensitive roles, "reasonable cause"
testing when an employee was suspected of being under the
influence, and intervention and rehabilitation programmes for
those affected by drug or alcohol dependency.
Air New Zealand group general manager for people, Vanessa
Stoddart, said the airline had previously made two OIA
applications to police for information on staff involved in
drink driving cases while on their way to work. One of those
cases was currently before the Employment Relations
Authority.
Mr Broad tonight issued a statement accepting the "numbers
involved are a small percentage of all of Air NZ employees".
"Superintendent John Kelly made a judgment in relation to the
knowledge that he had about employees of Air NZ that had been
caught over the blood-alcohol limit on their way to work.
"The information Superintendent Kelly had was sufficient for
him to decide that he ought to discuss the matter with the
Air NZ administration to ensure that Air NZ had appropriate
policies in place. Following those emails he was given
assurances from the airline and police were satisfied they
had sufficient policies in place."
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.