Green MP Sue Kedgley says it's unfair that her Animal Welfare
(Treatment of Animals) amendment bill, scheduled to be
debated in Parliament tonight, won't be subject to a
conscience vote.
Ms Kedgley requested the bill, which focuses on tightening
the Animal Welfare Act and eliminating loopholes that allow
practices such as housing sows and hens in crates and cages,
be subject to a conscience vote, but said that had been
denied by Speaker Lockwood Smith.
Dr Smith has meanwhile agreed to allow a bill from Maori
Party MP Te Ururoa Flavell, aimed at reducing social harm
caused by pokie machines, to be subject to a conscience vote.
That bill was unlikely to be debated until later in the
month.
Ms Kedgley said she was pleased Mr Flavell's Gambling Harm
Reduction Bill would be subject to a conscience vote, but
frustrated her one had been denied the same privilege on the
grounds that it was primarily an economic issue.
"Animal welfare is above all a moral and ethical issue, not
an economic issue," she said.
"Animal welfare deals with ethical issues such as whether it
is acceptable to allow highly intelligent animals, such as
pigs, to live miserable lives of suffering just to satisfy
our desire for cheap meat."
National and ACT have already indicated they won't support
the bill and Ms Kedgley said she believed there had been
pressure from Government members of the business committee to
veto the conscience vote request.
She said there seemed to be a lack of consistency in how
standing orders were applied when it came to conscience votes
and she had requested a review.
The Green Party has organised a demonstration outside
Parliament this afternoon to draw attention to the fact that
National and ACT were opposing the bill.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.