Govt's greenhouse gas target 'inadequate'

Nick Smith. Photo NZPA
Nick Smith. Photo NZPA
The Government has pledged to halve New Zealand greenhouse gases emissions from 1990 levels by 2050 but the promise has been labelled inadequate by environmentalists. 

Climate Change Minister Nick Smith said setting a long-term target provided certainty about domestic climate change policy.

Speaking at the New Zealand Climate Change Research Institute Forum in Wellington, Dr Smith said feedback from a recent public consultation supported setting a long-term emissions reduction target.

"We believe a 50 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 levels by 2050 . . . strikes the right balance. It has New Zealand doing our fair share and is comparable with the targets set by our major trading partners."

The move would require major changes in the next 40 years.

"The Government's existing programme includes the emissions trading scheme, support for home insulation, solar water heating systems, biofuels, electric cars and electrification of Auckland rail, and major research initiatives such as the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research."

Also an advisory group on green growth established in January would identify additional programmes to help achieve the reductions.

"This target will need to be regularly reviewed to take into account the latest science, development of new technologies, and progress by other countries. New Zealand's contribution to global emissions is very small and our objective should be neither to lead nor lag but do our fair share."

Environmental lobby group WWF said the target was ''totally inadequate''.

WWF-New Zealand climate change programme manager Peter Hardstaff said emissions needed to be reduced by at least 80 percent.

"Based on evidence collected up to 2005, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - the world's foremost scientific body on climate change - showed that to avoid runaway climate change, by 2050 industrialised countries need to cut emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels (the standard base-year used in climate negotiations)," he said.

"Rich countries such as New Zealand have a responsibility to act on the science and take action to cut emissions."

He said many government policies were going in the wrong direction; for instance, allowing state owned enterprise Solid Energy to proceed with plans to convert inefficient lignite coal into liquid fuel while measures adopted internationally such as vehicle fuel economy standards had not been adopted.

"Cutting global CO2 emissions, including New Zealand's, to safe levels is achievable. But it requires action from us all: individuals, businesses and government. And the quicker we act the better."

 

That is complete rubbish

Nick Smith's statement:

"We believe a 50 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 levels by 2050 . . . strikes the right balance. It has New Zealand doing our fair share and is comparable with the targets set by our major trading partners."

That is complete rubbish. Emissions reduction pledges can be viewed on the United Nations Environment Programme website(http://www.unep.org/climatepledges/Default.aspx?pid=1)

At least Mr Smith has the NZ figure right. The website states:

New Zealand -50% in 2050 based on 1990 levels 

However, for our 6 largest trading partners the figures are: 

EU -80%/-95% in 2050 based on 1990 levels

USA -83% in 2050 based on 2005 levels

Japan -60%/-80% in 2050 based on 1990 levels 

Australia - no 2050 pledge

China - no 2050 pledge

South Korea - no 2050 pledge

In what sense is 50% comparable to 80%? Our targets are clearly considerably less than those of our major trading partners. More to the point, how is the public expected to be able to judge the appropriateness of New Zealand's response to global warming when even our climate change minister doesn't seem to know what he's talking about?

Nick Smith and Green policies

The political consensus in this country is that New Zealand will look good on the world stage because we have an emissions trading scheme in place and that we are therefore leading the world in “fighting climate change”. This dubious honour comes despite earlier assurances by Prime Minister John Key that New Zealand would be a “fast follower” behind Australia. Back in 2005, Nick Smith argued that any form of carbon tax would be “mad” because “New Zealanders will be the only people in the world paying it” and that it “will drive up the costs of living and undermine the competitiveness of New Zealand business for negligible environmental gain.” Before he took on the National Government’s climate change portfolio, Nick Smith was scathing of Labour’s plan to introduce an emissions scheme and correctly argued that “it will not make one iota of difference to New Zealand’s emissions.” Yet as Environment Minister for climate change issues, Nick Smith seems to have changed his tune to become the driving force behind the current ETS.

ODT/directory - Local Businesses

CompanyLocationBusiness Type
Colloidal Health Solutions LimitedDunedinHealth Products
Macandrew Bay StoreDunedinSupermarkets
Dovedale ComputersDunedinComputer Services
Certified Design LimitedDunedinEngineers & Planners