Leaky home claims were yesterday revealed to be largely
behind a $2.9 million legal cost overspend by the Queenstown
Lakes District Council for the past financial year.
Legal costs of $606,000, a legacy of the Queenstown Airport
share-sale litigation, were last month said to be the only
major overspending by the Queenstown Lakes District Council
for that year.
However, in the draft 2010-11 annual report presented at
yesterday's full council meeting, Debra Lawson's
chief-executive report said a $2.4 million provision for
claims against the council had also been included.
The annual report goes on to list a total of five
building-related legal claims received in the district on
June 30, four of which related to "alleged weather-tightness
building defects".
Two of the five claims, to which the council has been joined
as a party, had been settled, with the remaining claims
totalling $9.9 million.
Council liability and the likely outcome was yet to be
determined, the report said.
However, the council estimated its exposure to the claims
would be $4 million.
When approached by the Otago Daily Times, QLDC deputy chief
executive Stewart Burns said such situations occurred when
the developer of a leaky home "has no money" to pay for a
claim.
If the QLDC was named in the development proceedings, as in
these particular cases, it might then be forced to "make a
large contribution" on the claim.
He confirmed this year was not the first time a leaky home
claim had been received by the council, but said no specific
information could be given on the claims, for reasons of
confidentiality.
Speaking during the meeting, Queenstown Lakes Mayor Vanessa
van Uden said that, as a general principle, she was "very
uncomfortable" with how the matter stood, but the situation
also required ratepayers to "step up".
"This issue single-handedly has a huge profile and it's all
about how people take care of their houses and how they
handle these things."
Cr Cath Gilmour raised the possibility of pursuing action at
a national level to prevent the costs coming back to
ratepayers.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.