Supporters of a no-fly zone over Libya called for a Security
Council vote today on a UN resolution aimed at preventing
Moammar Gadhafi's planes from conducting aerial attacks on
the Libyan people, but the United States was pushing for
broader action to protect civilians from land and sea attacks
as well.
Britain and France put a draft resolution that would impose a
no-fly zone in a final form yesterday after more than eight
hours of closed-door discussions by Security Council
ambassadors. France's UN Ambassador Gerard Araud said the
text was being sent to capitals overnight and could still be
changed before being put to a vote in the 15-member council.
With Gadhafi's forces intensifying attacks and heading toward
rebel-held Bengazi, Libya's second-largest city, US
Ambassador Susan Rice told the reporters the Obama
administration was "fully focused on the urgency and the
gravity of the situation on the ground."
According to a council diplomat who spoke on condition of
anonymity because the talks were private, Rice said during
more than eight hours of closed-door discussions by council
ambassadors the goal should be expanded from creating a
no-fly zone to protecting civilians, meaning the
international community must have all the tools it needs
including authorisation to use planes, troops or ships to
stop attacks by Gadhafi's air, land and sea forces.
According to the diplomat, Rice said the US would not act
without Security Council authorisation, did not want to put
US ground troops into Libya, and insisted on broad
international participation, especially by Arab states.
"We are interested in a broad range of actions that will
effectively protect civilians and increase the pressure on
the Gadhafi regime to halt the killing and to allow the
Libyan people to express themselves in their aspirations for
the future freely and peacefully," Rice told reporters after
the meeting.
"Those include discussion of a no-fly zone, but the US view
is that ... a no-fly zone has inherent limitations in terms
of protection of civilians at immediate risk."
The initial draft resolution would establish a ban on all
flights in Libyan airspace and authorize UN member states "to
take all necessary measures" to protect civilians.
But an amendment proposed by the United States and obtained
by The Associated Press would authorise states "to protect
civilians and civilian objects from the Gadhafi regime,
including by halting attacks by air, land and sea forces
under the control of the Gadhafi regime."
During the sometimes heated closed-door discussions, the
diplomat said Rice told council members the United States was
very concerned that Gadhafi's forces were on a rapid march to
Benghazi, and wanted the amendment because a no-fly zone was
not enough to protect civilians from probable atrocities.
It was unclear if the amendment the US was calling for would
remain in the text that was eventually put to a vote.
The diplomat said Russia, which has veto power, raised
serious questions about the use of force against Gadhafi and
other council nations reacted cautiously.
Lebanon, France and Britain introduced the draft resolution
Tuesday afternoon, spurred by the Arab League's urgent call
for a no-fly zone.
Rice told reporters the US was "working very hard" toward
having a vote today.
China's UN Ambassador Li Baodong, the current council
president, told reporters "we hope we will have real progress
tomorrow."
An Obama administration official, speaking on condition of
anonymity because council discussions are private, said the
United States was discussing a range of other concrete steps
with allies, both at the United Nations and at Nato. Among
those additional steps are greater humanitarian aid,
supporting the Libyan resistance with money from seized
Gadhafi-related assets, and greater enforcement of the UN
arms embargo on Libya.
Russia's UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin, whose government had
expressed misgivings about a no-fly zone, proposed that the
council vote first on a resolution calling for a cease-fire
in Libya.
Rice told reporters a majority of council members did not
support a separate cease-fire resolution but said that a call
for a cease-fire could be incorporated in the no-fly
resolution.
"We were not rejecting at all the larger resolution," Churkin
told reporters, adding that his country thought that the call
for a cease-fire "could possibly prevent impending bloodshed
in Libya."
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged all sides in Libya to
accept an immediate cease-fire.
Ban "is gravely concerned about the increasing military
escalation by government forces, which include indications of
an assault on the city of Benghazi," UN spokesman Martin
Nesirky said.
The UN chief warned that "a campaign to bombard such an urban
center would massively place civilian lives at risk," Nesirky
said.
While Russia and Germany expressed doubts, France pushed for
rapid action with Foreign Minister Alain Juppe saying in
Paris that several Arab countries have pledged to participate
in possible military action in the North African country.
Libya's deputy UN ambassador Ibrahim Dabbashi, who supports
the opposition, said five Arab countries have offered
support.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy called on leaders of the 14
other Security Council nations to "fully shoulder their
responsibilities and give support to this initiative."
"Together, we can save the martyred people of Libya," he
wrote in a letter. "It is now a matter of days, if not hours.
The worst would be that the appeal of the League of the Arab
States and the Security Council decisions be overruled by the
force of arms."
US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said during a
visit to Egypt the Obama administration was consulting with
the Arab League "about their understanding of the goals and
modalities of a no-fly zone as well as other forms of
support."
"We believe that this must be an international effort and
that there has to be decisions made in the Security Council
in order for any of these steps to go forward," she said.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.