A Pakistani paramilitary soldier secures an area as other
troops move toward a forward base during a military
operation against militants in Pakistan's Khurram tribal
region at the weekend. (AP Photo/Mohammad Zubair)
The Obama administration's decision to suspend $US800
million in aid to the Pakistan's military signals a tougher US
line with a critical but sometimes unreliable partner in the
fight against terrorism.
President Barack Obama's chief of staff, William Daley, said
in a broadcast interview the estranged relationship between
the United States and Pakistan must be made "to work over
time," but until it does, "we'll hold back some of the money
that the American taxpayers are committed to give" to the
country's powerful military forces.
The suspension of US aid, first reported by the New York
Times, followed a statement last week by Adm. Mike Mullen,
chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, that Pakistan's
security services may have sanctioned the killing of
Pakistani journalist Saleem Shahzad, who wrote about
infiltration of the military by extremists. His battered body
was found in June.
The allegation was rejected by Pakistan's powerful military
establishment, including the Inter-Services Intelligence
Agency, which has historic ties to the Taliban and other
militant groups and which many Western analysts regard as a
state-within-a-state.
George Perkovich, an expert on Pakistan with the Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace in Washington, said
Mullen's comments and the suspension of aid represent "the
end of happy talk," where the US tries to paper over
differences between the two nations.
Daley, interviewed on ABC's "This Week," suggested the
decision to suspend military aid resulted from the increasing
estrangement between the US and Pakistan. "Obviously there's
still a lot of pain that the political system in Pakistan is
feeling by virtue of the raid that we did to get Osama bin
Laden," Daley said.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters traveling with
him to Afghanistan on Saturday that the US would continue to
press Pakistan in the fight against extremists, including
al-Qaeda's new leader, Ayman al-Zawahri.
"We have to continue to emphasise with the Pakistanis that in
the end it's in their interest to be able to go after these
targets as well," Panetta said. "And in the discussions I've
had with them, I have to say that, you know, they're giving
us cooperation in going after some of these targets. We've
got to continue to push them to do that. That's key."
The US has long been unhappy with Pakistan's evident lack of
enthusiasm for carrying the fight against terrorists to its
tribal areas, as well as its covert support for the Taliban
and anti-Indian extremist groups.
But tensions ratcheted up in January, when CIA security
contractor Raymond Davis shot and killed two Pakistanis who
he said were trying to rob him. They spiked in May, when US
forces killed bin Laden during a covert raid on a home in
Abbottabad, the location of Pakistan's military academy.
In the US, there was anger at the possibility that some
Pakistan officials had harbored the terrorist leader. In
Pakistan, there was outrage that the US operation had
violated its sovereignty.
The $800 million in suspended aid represents 40 percent of
the $2 billion in US military aid to Pakistan, and according
to the Times includes money for counterterror operations.
The report said some of the money represented equipment that
can't be set up for training because Pakistan won't give
visas to the trainers. About $300 million was intended to
reimburse Pakistan for the cost of deploying 100,000 troops
along the Afghan border, the newspaper said.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.