The Iowa Supreme Court has ruled that employers in the state
can legally fire workers they find too attractive.
In a unanimous decision, the court held that a dentist did
not violate the state's civil rights act when he terminated a
female dental assistant whom his wife considered a threat to
their marriage.
The dental assistant, Melissa Nelson, who worked for dentist
James Knight for more than 10 years and had never flirted
with him, according to the testimony of both parties, sued,
saying she would not have been fired if she were a man.
At trial, Knight testified he had complained to Nelson on
several occasions that her clothing was too tight, revealing
and "distracting."
But sometime in 2009, he also began exchanging text messages
with Nelson. Most of these were work-related and harmless,
according to testimony. But others were more suggestive,
including one in which Knight asked Nelson how often she had
an orgasm. She never answered the text.
In late 2009, Knight's wife found out about the text
exchanges and demanded her husband terminate the dental
assistant because "she was a big threat to our marriage."
In early 2010, he fired her, saying their relationship had
become a detriment to his family.
Nelson sued, saying that she had done nothing wrong, that she
considered Knight a friend and father figure, and that she
would not have been terminated but for her gender.
Knight argued that Nelson was terminated not because of her
gender - all the employees of his practice are women - but
because of the way their relationship had developed and the
threat it posed to his marriage.
The seven justices, all men, said the basic question
presented by the case was "whether an employee who has not
engaged in flirtatious conduct may be lawfully terminated
simply because the boss views the employee as an irresistible
attraction."
The high court ruled that bosses can fire workers they find
too attractive and that such actions do not amount to
unlawful discrimination.
The case was Melissa Nelson v. James H. Knight DDS, PC and
James Knight.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.