Planners of Pride Campus never shied away from touting their
proposed high school as a haven for gay youth seeking refuge
from sometimes hostile traditional classrooms.
But under mounting pressure from ministers and gay activists
alike, the name has changed and the focus broadened to create
a school that would be one of the United States' largest to
serve any students victimized by bullying and harassment.
If approved by the country's third-largest school district on
Wednesday, the Social Justice Solidarity High School would
join several smaller US campuses aimed at serving students
who have been tormented for everything from their religious
beliefs to their weight.
It's a less explicitly gay version of a plan first presented
to Chicago's board of education in October by schools chief
Arne Duncan, whose name has been floated as a possible
Education Secretary under President-elect Barack Obama.
The Social Justice High School: Pride Campus was to open in
2010 and eventually serve 600 students, about half of whom
were expected to identify as gay.
The Solidarity plan has the same timeline and enrollment
goals, but a different mission.
The Pride Campus mission statement to serve "the underserved
population of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and
Questioning youth and their allies'' has been replaced by one
that offers protections for students regardless of
"orientation,'' but doesn't mention sexuality.
Instead, Solidarity school aims to address "citywide concerns
over violence, bullying and harassment.''
The new language echoes the mission statement of Milwaukee's
Alliance School, where lead teacher Tina Owen said staff have
been successful in attracting - and protecting - a wide range
of students, from those who identify as "Goth'' to teens with
disabilities.
"They find it to be a place where they can be themselves,''
Owen said."It's a safe place.''
But even without a mission statement aimed directly at gay
youth, about 60 percent of Alliance School's 125 students
identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered.
Not surprising considering students nationwide say sexual
orientation and gender identity are two of the top three
reasons behind bullying and harassment. Appearance is No. 1,
according to the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network
(GLSEN).
A 2007 GLSEN survey of more than 6,200 middle and high school
students found that 86 percent of gay, lesbian, bisexual or
transgendered students experienced harassment in the past
year because of their sexual orientation and 60 percent felt
unsafe at school.
In the same survey, 33 percent reported skipping a day of
school in the past month because they felt unsafe, compared
to 4.5 percent of a national sample of secondary school
students.
"Harassment is the rule, not the exception, if you're an LGBT
student,'' said Kevin Jennings, founder of the New York
City-based GLSEN.
Chicago's school board had been slated to vote on the Pride
Campus proposal in October, but the vote was delayed as
school officials and organizers heard from ministers, gay
activists and conservatives opposed to segregating gay
students.
"If we're going to have a separate high school, let's put the
bullies in the high school, not the (gay) kids,'' said Rick
Garcia, political director for the gay rights group Equality
Illinois.
The Rev. Wilfredo De Jesus of New Life Covenant Church on
Chicago's West Side said ministers' message to the school
board was "don't segregate, tolerate.''
"The gay community has fought so long to be inclusive and now
you're going to isolate them,'' De Jesus said. "This is not
sending the right message.''
Other conservative critics argued that gay teens aren't the
only ones being bullied and that taxpayer dollars shouldn't
be used to provide a one-sided education on such a
controversial topic.
Even Mayor Richard Daley, a longtime advocate for gay rights,
had questioned the wisdom of categorizing students.
"A holistic approach has always been to have children of all
different backgrounds ... in schools,'' Daley said recently.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.