The Eli Lilly warehouse is seen here in Enfield, Conn.,
Tuesday, March 16, 2010. Photo by AP.
In a Hollywood-style heist, thieves cut a hole in the
roof of a warehouse, rappelled inside and scored one of the
biggest hauls of its kind - not diamonds, gold bullion or Old
World art, but about $75 million ($NZ145.6 million) in
antidepressants and other prescription drugs.
The pills - stolen from the pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly
& Co. in quantities big enough to fill a tractor-trailer
- are believed to be destined for the black market, perhaps
overseas.
"This is like the Brink's pill heist," said Erik Gordon, a
University of Michigan business professor who studies the
health care industry, alluding to a famous bank delivery
truck robbery. "This one will enter the folklore."
The thieves apparently scaled the brick exterior of the
warehouse in an industrial park in Enfield, a town about
midway between Hartford and Springfield, Massachusetts,
during a blustery rainstorm before daybreak Sunday. After
lowering themselves to the floor, they disabled the alarms
and spent at least an hour loading pallets of drugs into a
vehicle at the loading dock, authorities said.
"Just by the way it occurred, it appears that there were
several individuals involved and that it was a very well
planned-out and orchestrated operation," Enfield Police Chief
Carl Sferrazza said. "It's not your run-of-the-mill home
burglary, that's for sure."
Experts described it as one of the biggest pharmaceutical
heists in history. Edward Sagebiel, a spokesman for
Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly, put the wholesale value of the
drugs at $75 million and said they included the
antidepressants Prozac and Cymbalta and the anti-psychotic
Zyprexa. No narcotics or other painkillers were in the
warehouse, he said.
Other pharmaceutical warehouses have been hit with similar
burglaries in recent years, but experts said the value of the
Eli Lilly heist far eclipses any other prescription-drug
thefts they have tracked.
The thieves could easily net $US20 million ($NZ38 million) to
$US25 million ($NZ48 million), Gordon said.
Enfield police would not say whether the building had
surveillance video or whether employees are being
investigated.
The building is unmarked and unprotected by fences.
The FBI was called in.
Experts said the heist shared many traits with warehouse
thefts of pharmaceuticals last year near Richmond, Virginia,
Memphis, Tennessee., and Olive Branch, Mississippi.
Those thieves also cut through ceilings and sometimes used
trapeze-style rigging to get inside and disable the main and
backup alarms. In some cases, they sprayed dark paint on the
lenses of security cameras; in others, they stole disks in
the security recording devices.
Enfield police and the FBI would not comment on whether some
of those techniques were also used in the Eli Lilly theft.
"The level of sophistication in these thefts is very high,"
said Dan Burges, director of intelligence at FreightWatch
International, a Texas-based security company. "These thieves
actively target certain products. They find out where they
are, they go there, they come looking for it. They probably
were conducting surveillance on that warehouse for days, if
not weeks, before that theft occurred."
Burges and Gordon said the thieves probably already had a
buyer lined up, possibly an online pharmacy or someone in
South America or Asia, where drug regulations are lax.
Gordon said it is unlikely the drugs would end up at a local
hospital or drugstore chain.
"The people with a reputation to protect, a CVS or a Target
or a Kroger or most hospitals, they don't want to take any
chances," he said. "It's too big a risk. You're talking about
people's health."
However, stolen drugs have made it into the US health care
system, often through Internet suppliers or crooked
wholesalers. Last June, thieves stole 129,000 vials of
insulin in North Carolina. The drugs were not properly
refrigerated, and later surfaced at a medical centre in
Houston.
The Food and Drug Administration said in August that some
patients suffered unsafe blood sugar levels after using them
and that it had recovered just 2% of the stolen insulin.
"We know that any number of unscrupulous people interested in
profit find ways to convince some secondary wholesalers to
put these products back into circulation and on into
pharmacies," FDA spokesman Tom Gasparoli said in a statement.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.