[image]Democratic House leaders predicted today the
final tally on President Barack Obama's historic health care
bill will meet or exceed the 216 votes required for passage.
Still at issue were the votes of a handful of members
concerned about the abortion issue.
In a show of confidence, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi emerged
from the final Democratic caucus before the vote wielding a
large gavel and leading Democrats across the street to the
Capitol for the final series of tallies.
"We are doing this for the American people," Pelosi said.
A protester disagreed and yelled back, "You're doing this to
the American people!" Others chanted Pelosi's name and
shouted, "Kill the bill! Kill the bill!" Supporters cheered
the speaker and other Democrats as they entered the Capitol.
Inside the House chamber, negotiations continued on the floor
while overhead in the visitors gallery, a protester hollered,
"The people don't want this!" As ushers tried to escort him
out, several Republicans stood up on the House floor and
cheered.
A few hundred protesters carrying signs opposing the health
care overhaul crowded a grassy area near the House side of
the Capitol. One sign read, "This bill is anti-American, vote
the bums out" while another stated, "Obamacare (equals) death
warrant for grandma." Appearing to outnumber Americans flags
were banners with the colonial-era slogan "Don't tread on
me."
Amid the heat, Democratic leaders said they had only a few
votes left to lock in. But none was willing to declare
victory - a hesitance Republicans attributed to public
controversy over the plan in a difficult election year.
The legislation, affecting virtually every American and more
than a year in the making, would extend coverage to an
estimated 32 million uninsured, bar insurers from denying
coverage on the basis of existing medical conditions, and cut
federal deficits by an estimated $138 billion over a decade.
Congressional analysts estimate the cost of the two bills
combined would be $940 billion over a decade.
Rep. Bart Stupak said he was one of about a half-dozen
anti-abortion Democrats who were working out language for a
presidential executive order that would provide more
assurances that no public money would be used for elective
abortions.
Although House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry
Waxman said his understanding was that Stupak had agreed to
vote "yes," Stupak told reporters that no deal had been made.
"I'm a 'no' vote. There's no agreement. There is no
agreement," Stupak told reporters on Sunday afternoon. "We
were close and we went one step forward and two back."
As the House opened the rare Sunday session, Democrats showed
progress toward the crucial threshold. Retiring Rep. Brian
Baird announced he would switch his "no" vote to "yes,"
convinced, he said, that the legislation was better than
doing nothing.
A key anti-abortion lawmaker, Rep. Marcy Kaptur stepped from
undecided to a "yes" vote because she believes the bill would
not allow federal money to be used for elective abortions.
At the White House, Obama surprised his senior staff by
showing up at a meeting. He was expected to make and take
calls from lawmakers as the session wore on.
Across the Capitol, Senate Democratic Whip Dick
Durbin said the Senate would be able to muster the
majority required to pass a package of fixes. Republicans
warned that passage would mean doom for the Democratic
majority on Election Day.
House Democrats were cautious but optimistic that they'd get
to or beyond 216 votes.
"There are still members looking at it and trying to make up
their minds," House Democratic leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md.,
said on NBC's "Meet the Press" in the hours before the vote.
He added that the holdouts numbered in "the low single
digits."
"We think there are going to be 216-plus votes when we call
the roll," Hoyer said.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz the party's deputy whip, also
said the votes were not yet in hand, telling "Fox News
Sunday" that Democrats were still short of "a hard 216."
Public anger over the rewrite played out in angry protests at
the doorstep of the Capitol.
It was unclear whether Obama would agree to issue an
executive order about abortion funding. Long-standing federal
policy bars U.S. aid for abortions except in cases of rape,
incest or when the mother's life is in danger.
"We have received assurances that we will work with the
administration to assure that existing law is maintained -
not to change it in any way, but to make sure that it applies
to this bill," Kaptur said.
Another snag involved widespread distrust among House members
that the Senate would be able to pass the "fixes" to the
bill. Durbin said on CBS' "Face the Nation" that he has
commitments of support from at least a majority of the
100-member chamber, but Democratic leaders have not released
a list of supporters.
Republicans warned they will make Democrats pay dearly in the
fall elections if the fiercely debated measure becomes law.
With Obama's emotional appeal from Saturday ringing in their
ears, House Democratic leaders prepared for three showdown
votes expected in the afternoon or evening. First up: a
"rule" to establish debate guidelines; on a package of
changes to a Senate-passed bill, including deletion of
special Medicaid benefits for Nebraska; and on the Senate
bill itself, the focus of intense national debate for months.
Democrats need 216 votes to pass each one. With all 178
Republicans and at least two dozen Democrats vowing to vote
no, the legislation's fate lay in the hands of the Democrats
who remained uncommitted ahead of Sunday's vote.
If Democratic leaders prevail on all three House votes, Obama
could sign the Senate version of the bill into law. The bill
of "fixes" would go to the Senate under fast-track debate
rules, called reconciliation, that would enable Democrats to
pass it without facing a Republican filibuster.
Democrats control 59 of the Senate's 100 seats, one vote shy
of the number needed to overcome bill-killing filibusters
from a united GOP.
House Democrats have long insisted that senators agree to
change the bill that the Senate passed on Christmas Eve.
Since then, it became deeply unpopular with many Americans,
because of the special deal for Nebraska, a new tax on
generous employer-provided health plans and other aspects.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.