SHAC national co-ordinator Tim Bishop (foreground), with,
from left, Otago Polytechnic administrative assistant
Tracey Paul, polytechnic carpentry tutor Matt Thompson,
polytechnic executive projects co-ordinator D'Arcy Dalzell
holding her daughter Zadie Tarbit (9 months), polytechnic
graphic design student Simon Horner and University of Otago
energy studies student Maria Callau and her daughter Maia
Puricelli (4). Photo by Linda Robertson.
Earlier this year, Otago Polytechnic won the tender to
organise the Sustainable Habitat Challenge '09, a competition
encouraging tertiary institutions to team up with architects,
builders, product suppliers, community groups and local
authorities to design and build sustainable and
environmentally-friendly houses. When
entries for the Ministry for the Environment-sponsored
challenge closed in October, 10 teams from Auckland to Dunedin
had submitted proposals. Staff writer Allison Rudd takes a look
at their plans.
Let's deal with the difficult bit first.
What is sustainability? Once the preserve of those perceived
as "greenies", the term sustainability has become a buzz word
particularly well-used by teachers and politicians.
It can mean different things in different contexts, but a
useful layman's definition is this: sustainability is putting
as much back into the environment as you take out - in other
words, meeting the needs of the present without compromising
the ability of future generations to meet their needs.
For Tim Bishop, the Sustainable Habitat Challenge - cutely
known as SHAC - is all about coming up with innovative ways
New Zealanders can live well while being free from reliance
on expensive resources.
That means houses which are better insulated, cost less to
heat, use the most efficient building methods possible, and
are not too expensive to construct.
It is also about collaborations, where teams tap into the
expertise of others in this country and overseas and explore
what is practical and possible to build today, Mr Bishop
says.
"It is fantastic to see people working together already . . .
discovering ideas which will work and ones which can't yet.
For example, one team wanted to install a grey water system
in their house which would reuse water but found it was too
expensive to do today. [However,] they are discovering what
it will take to be able to install such a system in the
future."
One of the aims of the challenge is to promote business
opportunities, as designers worked with New Zealand suppliers
and manufacturers to source or make products unavailable in
this country as yet.
One team doing just that is Team Waikato, a collaboration
between the Waikato Institute of Technology (Wintec), a
private businessman and the Hamilton City Council's eco
adviser.
It will use two products new to New Zealand in its 60sq m
transportable cottage.
The walls will be constructed of panels consisting of
soy-based foam sandwiched between sheets of plywood, while
the exterior cladding will be Australian-made weatherboards
manufactured from waste eucalyptus bark.
The businessman behind the panels has been trying to
introduce the system to New Zealand for many years, lead
designer Rod Yeoman says.
The panels, which would use plywood made of New Zealand pine,
were lighter, stiffer, had much better insulation qualities
and were much quicker to put together than a traditional
timber-framed house.
But because the system is untested in this country, no
building code is available and it had proved time-consuming
to obtain consent to use it.
"It's been a really interesting roller-coaster ride.
Because of the multilayered approach we have adopted for
construction, institutions and local authorities have found
the consent process complicated.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.