Liz Slooten
A recent High Court decision to uphold four of six
protection measures for Hector's dolphins has been met with
relief by University of Otago marine mammal specialist
Associate Prof Liz Slooten.
"In a nutshell, you win some and you lose some."
In 2008, a range of areas were closed by then fisheries
minister Jim Anderton to set-net and trawl fishing to protect
endangered Hector's and Maui's dolphins.
That was challenged by the inshore fishing industry.
The legal challenge centred on six specific restrictions that
flowed from decisions by the previous minister on area
closures and fishing method restrictions.
In its decision, released last month, the High Court ruled
two restrictions should be referred back to the Fisheries
Minister for reconsideration: the extension of set-net
closures on the North Island's West Coast from four nautical
miles to seven nautical miles, and the closure of an area of
the South Island's East Coast to targeted fishing for
butterfish.
Prof Slooten said it was a good decision and she would be
putting together a brief for Fisheries Minister David Carter
to explain the argument for butterfish fishing in kelp areas
"did not stand up at all".
"Hector's dolphins go into really shallow water.
At Porpoise Bay, in the Catlins, they are seen right up
against the shoreline."
Regarding the issue of the distance of the closure in the
North Island, she said reliable surveys had not shown Maui's
dolphins any further out than just past four nautical miles.
"There is no good scientific argument to extend it from four
to seven nautical miles."
However, the judgement potentially resulted in two further
compromises at the end of a long list of other compromises,
including a lack of protection for Tasman Bay, Golden Bay and
Taranaki, and for just three months of the year for the West
Coast, she said.
"So, the court case itself has ended in a satisfactory
outcome.
But we need to remember that Jim Anderton's decision was
already a substantial compromise."
Forest and Bird marine conservation advocate Kirstie Knowles
said Forest and Bird was happy the court saw the importance
of protecting Hector's dolphins from fishing threats.
"We are optimistic that the new minister will make the best
decision for these rare dolphins, and stick with the other
two protective measures."
New Zealand Federation of Commercial Fishing chief executive
Peter Dawson said he had not seen the decision and the
federation, one of four plaintiffs in the action, needed to
take a closer look and assess its implications.
"It has been a long and protracted process and we need to
assess it [the decision] before we decide how to proceed."
rebecca.fox@odt.co.nz
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.