Government efforts to trim the costs of student loans should
be commended.
The loans scheme is extremely generous, thanks to
interest-free terms for those living in New Zealand, and
extremely costly at $1.5 billion a year and rising.
More than 560,000 New Zealanders now have student loans,
totalling about $10 billion, with more students borrowing
more money each year.
Total drawings have increased 20% in the past 12 months, and
every year the burden on the taxpayer increases.
Isolated, small and debt-burdened New Zealand simply cannot
afford to carry on this way and needs to spend every dollar
prudently and wisely.
While student loans have helped make tertiary education more
widely available, they are open - like so much other
Government funding in so many spheres - to waste and abuse.
Student loans were first introduced by National in 1992.
They became interest exempt while studying under Labour in
2001, and then interest exempt for those resident in New
Zealand from 2006 after what was widely seen as a blatant
election bribe.
Now, there are good reasons for reintroducing interest
charges, perhaps at the estimated inflation rate plus a tiny
margin.
That would encourage borrowers to think twice about
student-loan debt while also avoiding the previous perils of
the compounding effects of higher-than-inflation interest
rates.
Many students faced spiralling debt before, and even as, they
began to pay off their loans.
Under lower interest rates, the Government would still face a
high-priced gap between the cost of its borrowing and its
lending.
But, at least, the taxpayer impost would be hundreds of
millions of dollars lower.
National is, however, at least for the foreseeable future,
committed to interest-free loans and, politically, dare not
go back on that.
Unfortunately, some students with easy access to "free" money
will borrow more than they strictly need, fostering
spendthrift ways rather than thrifty habits.
Others, with discipline and foresight, borrow maximums and
invest as much as possible.
A combination of inflation eroding the value of their debts
year-by-year, as well as their investment income, means they
are making money at the taxpayer's expense.
Of course, as well, there are others who are forced to borrow
large amounts to complete expensive courses and for basic
living costs.
Where, then, does all this leave Tertiary Education Minister
Stephen Joyce? The best he can do realistically is trim costs
here and there, try to minimise potential abuse and send
signals that discourage debt and encourage repayments.
In this light, extending the yearly $50 administration fee
already paid by students to those who have finished their
studies is fair, reasonable and pragmatic. Although the
estimated $15 million raised in the first year is small
change compared with the scheme's cost, every bit helps.
The administrative fee is also a small prod towards paying
back debt faster than required, especially in conjunction
with the 10% bonus discount National instituted last year.
Restricting loans to residents who have lived in New Zealand
for at least two years will prevent a ploy used by some new
immigrants to gain cheap education before returning home or
shifting to Australia.
For others, this has provided an opportunity to seize
Government tertiary support for the two-year period they are
ineligible to welfare benefits or student allowances.
And while many universities and polytechnics already reject
failing students, Mr Joyce's proposal that those who fail,
say, half their courses over two years lose access to loans
might prevent a few from institution hopping.
It is also hard to argue against undergraduate loan access
being limited to six or seven years.
The cost of student loans has risen to more than 40% of
Government tertiary funding, a proportion out of kilter with
direct funding.
The current and proposed changes fail to alter radically that
proportion.
Nevertheless, a prudent Government must it do its best to
contain student-loan costs.
It must send signals to students that it is in their interest
to borrow as little as possible and to repay loans as quickly
as they can.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.