Today will bring fresh disclosures of the extent of the
damage to Christchurch and its surrounding towns and villages
following Saturday's earthquake.
It is certain to be more substantial than early examination
has shown, certain to require much prioritising of repairs
which will take months to complete, and certain to cost more
than preliminary estimates.
No earthquake in our developed history may have caused more
damage on a more widespread scale to a larger urban area:
Christchurch is our second largest city, sprawling not far
short of the 40km distant from Cathedral Square to the
earthquake's epicentre at Darfield.
The catastrophe in Hawkes Bay in 1931 was the most
destructive of life, killing 256 people, and the most
destructive, at 7.9 on the Richter scale, largely destroying
Napier and Hastings.
Saturday's event, at 7.1 on the scale, miraculously seems to
have caused no loss of life but very severely damaged at
least 500 buildings and wrecked much underground
infrastructure.
That there was no loss of life is truly something at which to
marvel. Fortunately, most people were in their beds when the
earthquake occurred, at 4.36am.
The Hawkes Bay event occurred at 10.47am on a Tuesday, when
people were about their normal daily business; it lasted for
an extremely damaging two and a-half minutes and was centred
just 15km from Napier.
Though comparable in terms of damage and strength, the
Christchurch earthquake appears to have had several unusual
features.
Christchurch has not had a popular reputation for severe
earthquakes, being some distance from the New Zealand Alpine
Fault and lying on an alluvial plain.
Although scientists have long been mapping active faults
under the plain and in the foothills, this earthquake appears
to have occurred along an unknown fault line, and may have
been a close combination of several movements.
It will certainly belie any complacency in the country that
some regions are less prone to such events than others.
In this regard, much praise is due to the Civil Defence and
emergency services in Christchurch, which appear to have
functioned with skill and good organisation from the moment
the emergency began.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.