The tragic turn of events in the United Kingdom has cast a
pall over the excitement generated by last week's
announcement Prince William and his wife Catherine are
expecting a child, caused shock and distress, and once more
propelled the issue of media ethics into the international
spotlight.
Last week's ''prank'' call to the King Edward VII Hospital in
London, where the Duchess of Cambridge was receiving
treatment for severe morning sickness, made by two Sydney
radio show broadcasters pretending to be the Queen and Prince
Charles fooled two nurses. One was Jacinta Saldanha (46), who
took the call and transferred it to another nurse who
unwittingly gave details of the duchess' condition. Wife and
mother-of-two Ms.Saldanha was found late on Friday (New
Zealand time) unconscious in her nurses' accommodation and
died a short time later. Her death is being treated by police
as unexplained but appears likely to be a suicide.
Even before the tragic fallout, the hoax call by 2DayFM
presenters Mel Greig and Michael Christian had received
worldwide condemnation, with many horrified by the attempt to
solicit private information about the clearly ill duchess in
a fragile condition early in her pregnancy. Of course there
were others who found the original hoax - which was
pre-recorded and broadcast on-air and on the radio station's
website after receiving sign-off from the station's lawyers -
entertaining and, without the benefit of hindsight, a bit of
''harmless'' fun.
The radio station company has now removed the website
content. The presenters' Twitter accounts have been closed
and the pair are off air after they were inundated with angry
and threatening messages. The presenters have gone into
hiding and are reportedly receiving counselling.
While no-one could have foreseen the tragic outcome, the case
has sparked renewed debate internationally about media
ethics, already in the spotlight in the wake of the
recommendations from the Leveson report into press standards
in the UK, which followed the News of the World
phone-hacking scandal.
Only last week this newspaper stated that with the rights
associated with freedom of the press came great
responsibility.
But there is no doubt a sector of the public demands and
supports low-brow entertainment, salacious gossip, and
publicity stunts and jokes - often on the unsuspecting
public. Some radio stations and their ''shock jock''
presenters have notoriously sailed close to the wind in
providing this - as do some television shows worldwide - and
the digital age offers increasing access and means of
distribution for not just the good, but the bad and the ugly
as well. Royalty, politicians and the rich and famous have
often been seen as fair game - both by the media and the
public. They are already in the public eye, and in some cases
rely on the media to promote them and their causes, so are
seen as being able to expect to take the good with the bad.
While high-profile public figures are more likely to have
huge security and support networks in place and are perhaps
more used to media and public scrutiny - and better equipped
to cope with it - it appears in this case little thought was
given to others caught up in such events who may have no such
experience.
And, of course, what may be seen as fun to one person, can be
something entirely different to another.
Now the tables have been turned and the DJs are getting the
unwelcome spotlight shone on themselves. It is certainly
hoped there is no vigilante action taken against them, for
they - like others in this shocking saga - are now likely
facing intense soul-searching. There are no winners here.
Shame and humiliation have proved lethal partners. And the
shock and distress caused will no doubt ensure lessons for
the future are learnt. While it is easy to point the finger
and become involved in the blame game, perhaps it is more
important we turn the mirror on ourselves and consider our
own opinions and actions. For while we cannot know the
consequences of our actions, we can - and should - simply
treat others as we would like to be treated ourselves. The
principle of fairness is fundamental for a responsible media
- and something all individuals should strive to live by.
• For support or information about suicide prevention contact
Lifeline on 0800 543-354 or www.lifeline.co.nz
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.