The recent attacks on police in the North Island have
reignited debate about alcohol-fuelled violence, respect for
the law, and whether New Zealand police should be armed.
On Christmas Day, two Northland police officers were
hospitalised after being attacked by a group of party goers
in Dargaville. Several people have appeared in court on
charges relating to the incident in which an officer was
allegedly kicked, punched and beaten with a baseball bat
while he lay unconscious on the ground while the other
officer tried to shield his partner. An attempt was allegedly
made to use the officer's taser on him. The officers were
reportedly responding to a call from church-goers who saw
teenagers damaging letterboxes and street signs. The incident
came only days after three separate attacks on police in the
Waikato.
While the attacks are appalling, and have rightly put the
spotlight on anti-social behaviour and attitudes towards
police, it is worth remembering New Zealand police generally
enjoy a high level of respect from the public - especially
compared with many other countries in which police can be
viewed as corrupt or brutal. The fact New Zealand police walk
the beat, mingle with the public, actively work to foster
good relations between themselves and schools and other
organisations in the community - and do so unarmed - makes
them less threatening and more approachable and contributes
to that trust, respect and high public confidence.
But there is no doubt a sector of the community has no
respect for authority or the law. And it is clear when
alcohol or drugs become part of the mix, judgement often goes
out of the window and violent situations ensue.
''Had the people been rational and sober I doubt that this
would have happened, quite frankly,'' Whangarei-Kaipara
police area commander Inspector Tracy Phillips said of the
Dargaville incident. Police Commissioner Peter Marshall said
drunken violence against police would not be tolerated: ''It
is simply not OK that staff attending such a minor and easily
resolvable issue are subject to a serious assault.''
Police are, of course, trained to be prepared for all sorts
of incidents and to expect the unexpected. But the level of
the violence used against them in these cases - in which they
were responding to what appeared to be routine callouts -
could not be predicted. Sadly, other emergency services
workers have suffered similar incidents while attending
callouts - again often by drunken people and often acting as
part of a pack mentality. In the wake of such incidents come
the inevitable questions about whether police should carry
arms - to protect themselves and defuse situations.
Many frontline police have access to firearms in locked safes
in their vehicles. There are 17 armed offenders squads,
covering all main centres, which respond to and resolve
situations in which there is a threat of weapons. Proponents
of arming police - notably the Police Association - say it is
unacceptable for police to face such risks doing their job
and they must have the protection of weapons. Opponents say
arming police increases the potential for violent outcomes by
spurring an arms race and creating a tenser environment,
which actually reduces police and public safety. Certainly,
the fact a taser was taken and an attempt made to use it
against one of the officers in the Dargaville incident shows
how easily the same could happen with a firearm.
There are undoubtedly risks involved in policing and attacks
against the police should not be tolerated and the
perpetrators brought swiftly to justice. But the causes of
such violence - notably society's access to and attitude
towards alcohol, and acceptance of and ready recourse to
violence - should surely be addressed as part of the mix
before any drastic changes are made to the fundamental way in
which policing is done in New Zealand.
The public is lucky it has a brave force prepared to take
risks to ensure its safety. But it is precisely for the
reason of safety, the vision of gun-toting police walking our
city streets or driving our rural roads should surely strike
fear into the hearts of all New Zealanders.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.