How will Finance
Minister Bill English handle unhappy news next Tuesday when
Treasury updates its Budget forecasts, as it is obliged to do
before next month's election?
There's a clue in how he handled the largest budget deficit
in New Zealand's history - $18.4 billion as set out in the
final accounts presented by Treasury last week - or in how he
handled the double downgrade of New Zealand credit rating
last month.
Without an iota of ignominy.
He follows the time-honoured practice of governments to own
the achievements and disown the failures.
On past form, Mr English will turn Tuesday's bad news to his
advantage, reinforcing the need to maintain National's course
- to keep a tight rein on public spending, to cut long-term
welfare dependency, to keep borrowing down and savings up.
And he will use the gloomy news to paint high-cost policies
by other parties as profligate and irresponsible.
The inevitable decline in growth forecasts will be blamed on
events beyond his control, in Europe, the United States and
Canterbury.
It may well be the last time the electorate gives National a
chance to blame someone else, or somewhere else, for worse
outcomes than those promised.
National's veritable Southern Man has emerged from his first
term as finance minister as a dependable, safe pair of hands,
having weathered a ministerial housing scandal early on.
The pressure in a second term would be greater, and much of
it self-imposed.
Mr English has made it clear National won't budge on its
commitment to get the books back into surplus in the 2014-15
year.
If the summit in Europe at the weekend over Greece's debt
crisis fails to deliver the leadership required and the world
is back in recession, an uncompromising track to surplus
could require greater cuts in public expenditure and a risk
of choking the recovery.
None of this will be a risk for National before the election,
but it could turn ugly after it.
Amid all the uncertainty, there is one certainty: if National
wins a second term, Bill English will still be finance
minister.
The only alternative is Steven Joyce. There was speculation
earlier this term when Mr English was mired in a ministerial
housing scandal and Mr Joyce's star was rising that Mr Joyce
would step into the finance role for any second term, but
that has long since evaporated.
Mr Joyce could well move into the economic development and
science and innovation portfolios.
But there would be no question that Mr English would keep
finance.
Any challenge of that notion is from opposition parties
playing to the media, or by the media looking for some spicy
conflict. But it is not an issue in National.
There is no reason to break what has so far been a highly
successful partnership between Mr Key and Mr English.
The partnership began as a negotiated one, not a natural one,
back in 2006, when Mr Key was set to fill Don Brash's vacancy
as leader.
Mr English led a small but important faction in the caucus,
including Simon Power and Katherine Rich, who had been
disaffected after Dr Brash ousted Mr English - some say with
Mr Key's vote, though he denies it - and they needed to be
part of Mr Key's team, not an adjunct.
In Mr English, Mr Key had a deputy who had the things he
didn't: experience in politics, an abiding interest in policy
development and detail and National Party blood running
through his veins.
Mr Key's inexperience - leading the party after just four
years in Parliament - turned out not to be a major
disadvantage because he learned so quickly.
But each of their talents still complement the other's: Mr
Key is the out-there optimistic, socially liberal, rather
poll-driven leader; Mr English is the laconic, understated,
socially conservative, intellectually robust deputy.
The angry "bitter Bill" of opposition days disappeared with
the acquisition of real power, probably more than the Prime
Minister, and an acceptance that he will never be prime
minister.
Mr English is the one with the plans, the quiet reformer, who
is steadily reshaping the public sector to make more room for
the private sector in areas of government, be it in the
management of prisons, the administering of social housing or
the ownership of state assets.
The fiscal pressures have given Mr English the political
scope to reshape the public sector in way he would like to
have done, even if the global recession had not happened.
There has also been a pattern to the way reforms are
developed under National - set up a task force, appoint
people of high credibility but who are likely to deliver the
sort of result National wants, issue discussion documents and
interim reports along the way so there is no shock at the end
result. Respond. Implement.
John Key's legacy to National has been his ability to deliver
power through popular leadership; Bill English's legacy will
be in the way he has exercised power.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.