Religious commitment is a powerful inspiration to
act for social justice, writes Andrew Bradstock, of
Dunedin. Today, the Salvation Army releases its 2012
"state of the nation" report.
Called The Growing Divide, the report will be launched
in four locations, with the Dunedin event hosted by the
University of Otago Centre for Theology and Public Issues.
Last year, the university signed a "memorandum of
understanding" with the Salvation Army, and today's event
demonstrates the developing relationship between the two
bodies.
Now in their fifth year, these Salvation Army reports present
an overview of New Zealand society, focusing on children's
health and wellbeing; work and income; housing; crime and
punishment; and "social hazards" like alcohol, drug use and
gambling. This year's report examines the key indicators of
the growing inequality in our nation.
Drawing upon professional research, and the Salvation Army's
experience of working at the "chalk face" on the issues they
cover, these "state of the nation" reports pull no punches
when it comes to telling how things are.
Because it is non-party political, the Salvation Army engages
in straight-talking, regardless of who is in power. Its first
report in 2008, the last year Labour was in office, noted a
lack of progress with respect to key areas like crime,
imprisonment and the number of children living at risk of
harm. Subsequent reports have noted a lack of focus on young
and disadvantaged people under National. A recurring feature
of these reports is a call to refocus our social priorities.
Last year's report noted that we had "stalled" in terms of
tackling problems such as "unaffordable housing,
alcohol-fuelled family violence, child poverty and youth
disaffection", yet argued that we could, as a country, do
something about them. It is all about what we consider
important and what we do not, the report said.
As the director of the Army's Social Policy and Parliamentary
Unit, Major Campbell Roberts, said at the launch of last
year's report, "There has been sufficient money to bail out
the investors of failed finance companies, provide tax relief
for the highest earners and fund new prisons, but the message
seems to be that we don't have the funds or the will to solve
or at least mitigate our most pressing social problems." Of
course governments needed to be "fiscally responsible" in the
wake of the recession, Major Roberts said, but that did not
mean ignoring "the long-term social and financial costs of
letting a large proportion of the nation languish and
suffer".
The striking thing about the Salvation Army's approach,
evident in these reports and other material it produces on
specific issues, is a willingness to look beyond the symptoms
of social problems to their causes.
Like a number of other religious and non-religious
organisations, they are the embodiment of Martin Luther
King's observation that, while we are called to be Good
Samaritans, after we lift so many people out of the ditch we
start to wonder whether the whole road to Jericho needs to be
repaved.
So, in its 2011 report, the Army criticised both Labour and
National for simply "deal[ing] pragmatically with the
problems of the day without really ever addressing the
underlying causes of these problems".
It is often said that religious faith is irrelevant in the
21st century, but the commitment of groups like the Salvation
Army to speak from their grass-roots engagement with
communities, backing up their claims with statistical
evidence, puts the lie to that. The Salvation Army may be the
best-known "faith-based" organisation committed to a more
just society, but it is hardly the only one.
Not that religious commitment is the only inspiration to act
for social justice, of course, but it is a powerful one. For
Christians, the call in the Bible for communities to practise
justice, with a particular focus on the most vulnerable and
marginalised, has proved a compelling trigger for selfless
action and commitment.
A desire to take seriously the injunction to "love your
neighbour", to make real the practical commitment of Jesus
that all should enjoy "life to the full" (John 10.10), has
inspired countless Christians to seek the material, economic
and spiritual wellbeing of people through the centuries.
And many have discovered that doing that effectively involves
not just fishing people out of the river, but going upstream
to find out who is pushing them in. It will always be for
democratically elected politicians to decide social policy,
but when their decisions have a detrimental effect on people
and communities, those trying to pick up the pieces have a
responsibility to challenge those decisions and call for
fresh thinking and new vision. And the reputation it has
built up over more than 100 years means that the Salvation
Army is listened to.
That is why the release of its "state of the nation" report
today is so important. I hope it will be read by all with the
responsibility to lead us at this time, facing as we do such
serious challenges in areas like child poverty, family
violence and drug and alcohol abuse.
More importantly, I hope it will lead to some serious
"repaving work" on our equivalents here of the Jericho road.
• Andrew Bradstock is Howard Paterson professor of
theology and public issues at the University of Otago and
director of the University's Centre for Theology and Public
Issues.
A name, residential address, and (preferably residential) telephone number is required from readers who comment on ODT Online. These details will not be visible to site visitors.